Nix v. State of South Carolina
Plaintiff: Gerald Nix and Gerald Deon Nix
Defendant: State of South Carolina
Respondent: Kershaw Correctional Institution
Case Number: 8:2020cv00311
Filed: January 27, 2020
Court: US District Court for the District of South Carolina
Presiding Judge: Timothy M Cain
Referring Judge: Kevin McDonald
Nature of Suit: Habeas Corpus (General)
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on February 25, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
February 25, 2020 Filing 10 ***DOCUMENT MAILED #9 Proper Form Order, placed in U.S. Mail from Greenville Clerks Office to Gerald Nix 327703 Kershaw Correctional Institution HA 248 4848 Goldmine Hwy Keshaw, SC 29067 with blank 2254 petition and IFP application as directed. (kric, )
February 25, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 9 PROPER FORM ORDER Case to be brought into proper form by 3/10/2020. Add an additional 3 days only if served by mail or otherwise allowed under Fed. R. Civ. P. 6. Signed by Magistrate Judge Kevin McDonald on 2/25/2020. (kric, ) Modified on 2/25/2020 to edit deadline(kric, ).
February 24, 2020 Filing 7 Letter regarding proper form from Gerald Nix. (Attachments: #1 incomplete proper from documents, #2 Envelope)(kric, )
February 3, 2020 Filing 6 ***DOCUMENT MAILED #5 Proper Form Order with blank 1983 complaint form, AO240 form, financial certificate, summons, 2 USM-285 forms, placed in U.S. Mail from Greenville Clerks Office to Gerald Nix, #327703, Kershaw Correctional Institution, HA 248, 4848 Goldmine Hwy, Keshaw, SC 29067. (kmca)
February 3, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 5 PROPER FORM ORDER directing Plaintiff to notify the clerk in writing of any change of address. Case to be brought into proper form by 2/24/2020. ***Add an additional 3 days only if served by mail or otherwise allowed under Fed. R. Civ. P. 6.*** Signed by Magistrate Judge Kevin McDonald on 2/3/20. (kmca)
January 27, 2020 Filing 1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus, filed by Gerald Nix. (Attachments: #1 Memo in Support, #2 Envelope)(kric, ) Modified on 2/25/2020 to edit entry number after correcting event type at chambers request (kric, ).
January 27, 2020 Filing 2 TRUE DIVISION FOR TRIAL: Columbia. (kric, )

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the South Carolina District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Nix v. State of South Carolina
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Gerald Nix
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Gerald Deon Nix
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: State of South Carolina
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: Kershaw Correctional Institution
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?