John Hancock Life Insurance Company (U.S.A.) v. Cox et al
John Hancock Life Insurance Company (U.S.A.) |
Brenda Quarles Cox and Kandi Tallent Balmer |
8:2020cv02216 |
June 11, 2020 |
US District Court for the District of South Carolina |
Henry M Herlong |
Insurance |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on September 2, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 6 ACCEPTANCE OF SERVICE OF COMPLAINT by John Hancock Life Insurance Company (U.S.A.). Brenda Quarles Cox served on 6/15/2020, answer due 7/6/2020. (Devlin, Chadwick) |
Filing 5 ACCEPTANCE OF SERVICE OF COMPLAINT by John Hancock Life Insurance Company (U.S.A.). Kandi Tallent Balmer served on 6/15/2020, answer due 7/6/2020. (Attachments: #1 Supporting Documents Acceptance of Service of Kandi Balmer)(Devlin, Chadwick) |
Filing 4 Summons Issued as to Kandi Tallent Balmer, Brenda Quarles Cox. (abuc) |
Filing 3 Local Rule 26.01 Answers to Interrogatories by John Hancock Life Insurance Company (U.S.A.).(abuc) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Kandi Tallent Balmer, Brenda Quarles Cox (Filing fee $ 400 receipt number 0420-9151724.), filed by John Hancock Life Insurance Company (U.S.A.). Service due by 9/9/2020 (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - Policy, #2 Exhibit B - Application, #3 Exhibit C - 11.15.19 Change of Beneficiary Form, #4 Exhibit D - 12.9.19 Change of Beneficiary Form)(abuc) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the South Carolina District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.