Queen v. Zefco Inc et al
| Cody Queen |
| Zefco Inc, Lanette Zearley and William Zearley |
| 8:2020cv02629 |
| July 16, 2020 |
| US District Court for the District of South Carolina |
| Timothy M Cain |
| Other Statutory Actions |
| 26 U.S.C. ยง 7434 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on September 10, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 15 TEXT ORDER granting #14 Consent Motion for Extension of Time to File Response re #10 MOTION to Dismiss New Complaint. Response to #10 Motion due by 9/30/2020. Entered at the direction of the Honorable Timothy M Cain on 9/10/20.(kmca) |
| Filing 14 Consent MOTION for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply as to #10 MOTION to Dismiss New Complaint by Cody Queen. Response to Motion due by 9/23/2020. Add an additional 3 days only if served by mail or otherwise allowed under Fed. R. Civ. P. 6 or Fed. R. Crim. P. 45. No proposed order.(Burnette, Mary) |
| Filing 12 DELETION OF DOCKET ENTRY NUMBER #11 Memorandum in Support of Defendants' Motion to Dismiss. Reason: attached to entry #10 Motion to Dismiss, as requested by filing user. Corrected Filing Document Number #10 Motion to Dismiss. Corrected same day as original filing: 9/2/20. (kmca) |
| Filing 10 MOTION to Dismiss New Complaint by Lanette Zearley, William Zearley, Zefco Inc. Response to Motion due by 9/16/2020. Add an additional 3 days only if served by mail or otherwise allowed under Fed. R. Civ. P. 6 or Fed. R. Crim. P. 45. No proposed order.(Major, Denny) (Additional attachment added on 9/2/2020: as requested by filing user: #1 Memo in Support) (kmca). (Attachment 1 replaced on 9/2/2020: to replace with corrected document (footnote size) as provided by filing user) (kmca). |
| Filing 8 TEXT ORDER granting #7 Motion to Appear Pro Hac Vice. Attorney Richard Paul Neuworth added for Plaintiff. Entered at the direction of the Honorable Timothy M Cain on 7/28/20.(kmca) |
| Filing 7 MOTION to Appear Pro Hac Vice by Richard Paul Neuworth ( Filing fee $ 250 receipt number 0420-9233062) by Cody Queen. Response to Motion due by 8/5/2020. Add an additional 3 days only if served by mail or otherwise allowed under Fed. R. Civ. P. 6 or Fed. R. Crim. P. 45. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1 - Application for Pro Hac Vice Admission, #2 Exhibit 2 - Certificate of Good Standing, #3 Exhibit 3 - Proposed Order)No proposed order.(Burnette, Mary) (Attachment 1 replaced on 7/23/2020: to replace with corrected document as provided by filing user) (kmca). (Attachment 2 replaced on 7/28/2020: to replace with corrected document as provided by filing user) (kmca). |
| Filing 6 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Cody Queen. Zefco Inc served on 7/22/20, answer due 8/12/20. William Zearley served on 7/22/20, answer due 8/12/20. Lanette Zearley served on 7/22/20, answer due 8/12/20. (Attachments: #1 Acceptance of Service)(kmca) Document re-filed by clerk to correct event. (kmca) Modified on 7/22/2020: to correct document number (kmca). |
| Filing 4 Summons Issued as to Lanette Zearley, William Zearley, Zefco Inc. (kmca) |
| Filing 3 Local Rule 26.01 Answers to Interrogatories by Cody Queen.(kmca) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Lanette Zearley, William Zearley, Zefco Inc (Filing fee $400 receipt number 0420-9221185), filed by Cody Queen. Service due by 10/14/2020. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1 - Overtime Per Diem, #2 Exhibit 2 - Paystubs, #3 Exhibit 3 - Bonus Pay, #4 Exhibit 4 - Bonus Check, #5 Exhibit 5 - Severance Pay)(kmca) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the South Carolina District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
