Carter v. Ascend Performance Material Holdings, Inc.
| Latesha Carter |
| Ascend Performance Material Holdings, Inc., Ascend Performance Materials Operations, LLC doing business as Ascend Performance Materials and Ascend Performance Material Holdings, Inc. doing business as Ascend Performance Materials |
| 8:2020cv04379 |
| December 18, 2020 |
| US District Court for the District of South Carolina |
| Timothy M Cain |
| Kevin McDonald |
| Labor: Family and Medical Leave Act |
| 29 U.S.C. ยง 2601 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on September 26, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 14 Defendants' ANSWER to #9 Amended Complaint by Ascend Performance Material Holdings, Inc., Ascend Performance Materials Operations, LLC.(Gantt-Sorenson, Christine) |
| Filing 13 MEDIATION ORDER Mediation Due by 7/19/2021, Signed by Honorable Timothy M Cain on 1/27/2021. (kric, ) |
Filing 12
SCHEDULING ORDER Rule 26(f) Conference Deadline 2/16/2021, 26(a) Initial Disclosures due by 3/2/2021, Rule 26 Report due by 3/2/2021, Motions to Amend Pleadings due by 4/12/2021, Plaintiffs ID of Expert Witness due by 5/12/2021, Defendants ID of Expert Witnesses Due by 6/11/2021, Records Custodian Affidavit due by 6/11/2021, Discovery due by 7/12/2021, Motions due by 7/26/2021, Jury Selection Deadline 10/4/2021, Signed by Honorable Timothy M Cain on 1/27/2021. (kric, )
|
|
Filing 11
TEXT ORDER granting #8 the unopposed motion for pro hac vice admission of Rachel Powitzky Steely. IT IS SO ORDERED Signed by Magistrate Judge Kevin McDonald on 1/20/2021.(kric, )
|
| Filing 10 Summons Issued as to Ascend Performance Material Holdings, Inc., Ascend Performance Materials Operations, LLC. Amended Complaint (Attachments: #1 Ascend Performance Materials Operations, LLC summons)(kric, ) |
| Filing 9 AMENDED COMPLAINT against All Defendants, filed by Latesha Carter. Service due by 4/20/2021 (Attachments: #1 Summons, #2 Summons) (Murphy, Brian) |
| Filing 8 MOTION to Appear Pro Hac Vice by Rachel Powitzky Steely ( Filing fee $ 350 receipt number 0420-9596815) by Ascend Performance Material Holdings, Inc.. Response to Motion due by 2/2/2021. Add an additional 3 days only if served by mail or otherwise allowed under Fed. R. Civ. P. 6 or Fed. R. Crim. P. 45. (Attachments: #1 Supporting Documents Application/Affidavit for Pro Hac Vice Admission, #2 Supporting Documents Certificate of Good Standing)No proposed order.Motions referred to Kevin McDonald.(Gantt-Sorenson, Christine) |
| Filing 7 Defendant's Local Rule 26.01 Answers to Interrogatories by Ascend Performance Material Holdings, Inc..(Gantt-Sorenson, Christine) |
| Filing 6 Defendant's ANSWER to #1 Complaint by Ascend Performance Material Holdings, Inc..(Gantt-Sorenson, Christine) |
| Filing 5 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Latesha Carter. Ascend Performance Material Holdings, Inc. served on 12/28/2020, answer due 1/19/2021. (Attachments: #1 Supporting Documents PS Form 3811 - Ascend Performance Material Holdings, Inc.)(Murphy, Brian) |
| Filing 4 Local Rule 26.01 Answers to Interrogatories by Latesha Carter.(rweb, ) |
| Filing 3 Summons Issued as to Ascend Performance Material Holdings, Inc.. (rweb, ) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Ascend Performance Material Holdings, Inc. ( Filing fee $ 402 receipt number 0420-9541025.), filed by Latesha Carter. Service due by 3/18/2021(rweb, ) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the South Carolina District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
