Vazquez v. Knight et al
| Jesus Vazquez |
| Melissa Forsyth and Stevie Knight |
| 8:2021cv00314 |
| February 1, 2021 |
| US District Court for the District of South Carolina |
| Jacquelyn D Austin |
| Richard M Gergel |
| Habeas Corpus (General) |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2241 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on April 27, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 18 CERTIFIED MAIL RECEIPT re #12 Order - Habeas-Service-No Answer, served on Attorney General of United States on 3/26/2021. (sgri) Modified to correct filing date on 4/2/2021 (sgri) |
| Filing 16 OBJECTION to #13 Report and Recommendation by Jesus Vazquez. Reply to Objections due by 4/14/2021 Add an additional 3 days only if served by mail or otherwise allowed under Fed. R. Civ. P. 6. (Attachments: #1 Envelope) (sgri) |
| Filing 15 ***DOCUMENTS MAILED CERTIFIED #12 Order - Habeas-Service-No Answer, placed in U.S. Mail from Greenville Clerks Office to Attorney General of the United States US Department of Justice Room B-103 950 Pennsylvania A venue Washington, DC 20530-0001. Tracking #9414711899560396949244. (sgri) Modified to edit text on 3/19/2021 (sgri) |
| Filing 14 ***DOCUMENTS MAILED #13 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION #12 Order - Habeas-Service-No Answer, placed in U.S. Mail from Greenville Clerks Office to Jesus Vazquez 14275-018 FCI Estill PO Box 699 Estill, SC 29918. (sgri) |
| Filing 13 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that the 2241 Petition be DISMISSED without prejudice and without requiring the Respondent to file an answer or return. It is further recommended that Petitioner's motion for expedited review be DENIED. Objections to R&R due by 4/1/2021 Add an additional 3 days only if served by mail or otherwise allowed under Fed. R. Civ. P. 6 or Fed. R. Crim. P. 45. Signed by Magistrate Judge Jacquelyn D. Austin on 3/18/2021. (sgri) |
Filing 12
ORDER authorizing service of process by clerk, directing respondent not to answer and directing the petitioner to notify the clerk in writing of any change of address. (Attachments: #1 2241 Writ of Habeas Corpus) Signed by Magistrate Judge Jacquelyn D. Austin on 3/18/2021. (sgri)
|
| Filing 10 Filing fee: $5.00, receipt number SCX600008820. (sgri) |
| Filing 8 ***DOCUMENT MAILED #6 Proper Form Order, placed in U.S. Mail from Greenville Clerks Office to Jesus Vazquez 14275-018 FCI Estill PO Box 699 Estill, SC 29918 with AO240 application as directed. (kric, ) |
|
Filing 6
PROPER FORM ORDER Case to be brought into proper form by 2/26/2021. Add an additional 3 days only if served by mail or otherwise allowed under Fed. R. Civ. P. 6. The Court finds, at this time, that Petitioners request for expedited consideration of his Petition is without merit. The Clerk of Court is directed to terminate from the docket Melissa Forsyth. Signed by Magistrate Judge Jacquelyn D Austin on 2/5/2021. (kric, )
|
| Filing 3 MOTION Notice for Immediate Consideration by Jesus Vazquez. Response to Motion due by 2/17/2021. Add an additional 3 days only if served by mail or otherwise allowed under Fed. R. Civ. P. 6 or Fed. R. Crim. P. 45. No proposed order.Motions referred to Jacquelyn D. Austin. (sgri) |
| Filing 1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Attachments: #1 Memo in Support, #2 Supporting Documents, #3 Administrative Remedy Process, #4 Program Review and Participation Log, #5 Male Pattern Score, #6 Declaration of Jesus Vazquez) Filed by Jesus Vazquez. (sgri) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the South Carolina District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
