Morgan v. Bridge Brothers, Inc.
| Charles Morgan |
| Bridge Brothers, Inc. |
| 8:2021cv00993 |
| April 5, 2021 |
| US District Court for the District of South Carolina |
| Jacquelyn D Austin |
| Donald C Coggins |
| Civil Rights: Americans with Disabilities - Employment |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on May 24, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 10
TEXT ORDER granting #9 motion to appear pro hac vice. Signed by Magistrate Judge Jacquelyn D. Austin on 5/24/2021. (sgri)
|
| Filing 9 MOTION to Appear Pro Hac Vice by John T. Stembridge ( Filing fee $ 350 receipt number 0420-9851221) by Bridge Brothers, Inc.. Response to Motion due by 6/1/2021. Add an additional 3 days only if served by mail or otherwise allowed under Fed. R. Civ. P. 6 or Fed. R. Crim. P. 45. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Application for Pro Hac Vice with Certificate of Good Standing, #2 Proposed Order Proposed Order)Proposed order is being emailed to chambers with copy to opposing counsel.Motions referred to Jacquelyn D Austin.(McMillan, Elizabeth) |
|
Filing 8
CONFERENCE AND SCHEDULING ORDER: Rule 26(f) Conference Deadline 5/27/2021, 26(a) Initial Disclosures due by 6/10/2021, Rule 26 Report due by 6/10/2021, Motions to Amend Pleadings due by 7/1/2021, Plaintiffs ID of Expert Witness due by 8/2/2021, Defendants ID of Expert Witnesses Due by 9/1/2021, Records Custodian Affidavit due by 9/1/2021, Discovery due by 11/1/2021, Motions due by 1/3/2022, Mediation Due by 12/1/2021, This case is subject to being called for jury selection and trial thirty (30) days following the issuance of a Report and Recommendation on any motion described in paragraph 9 of this Order, unless otherwise ordered by the Court. Signed by Magistrate Judge Jacquelyn D. Austin on 5/6/2021. (sgri)
|
| Filing 7 DISCLOSURE STATEMENT PURSUANT TO FRCP 7.1 by Bridge Brothers, Inc..(McMillan, Elizabeth) |
| Filing 6 ANSWER to #1 Complaint by Bridge Brothers, Inc..(McMillan, Elizabeth) |
| Filing 5 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Charles Morgan. Bridge Brothers, Inc. served on 4/23/2021, answer due 5/14/2021. (Attachments: #1 Supporting Documents PS Form 3811 - Bridge Brothers, Inc.)(Murphy, Brian) |
| Filing 4 Summons Issued as to Bridge Brothers, Inc. (sgri) |
| Filing 3 Local Rule 26.01 Answers to Interrogatories by Charles Morgan. (sgri) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Bridge Brothers, Inc. ( Filing fee $ 402 receipt number 0420-9753454.), filed by Charles Morgan. Service due by 7/6/2021. (sgri) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the South Carolina District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Morgan v. Bridge Brothers, Inc. | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Charles Morgan | |
| Represented By: | Brian P Murphy |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Bridge Brothers, Inc. | |
| Represented By: | Elizabeth McMillan |
| Represented By: | John T Stembridge |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
