Morton v. State of South Carolina
Robert Austin Morton |
State of South Carolina |
8:2021cv01037 |
April 8, 2021 |
US District Court for the District of South Carolina |
Jacquelyn D Austin |
Joseph Dawson |
Habeas Corpus (General) |
28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on March 14, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 15 ***DOCUMENTS MAILED #14 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION re #1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus filed by Robert Austin Morton, #13 Order - Habeas-Service-No Answer, placed in U.S. Mail from Greenville Clerks Office to Robert Austin Morton #367915 37 Brand Street Sumter, SC 29150. (sgri) |
Filing 14 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION re #1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus. It is recommended that this action be dismissed without prejudice and without requiring the Respondent to file an answer or return. Objections to R&R due by 6/16/2021 Add an additional 3 days only if served by mail or otherwise allowed under Fed. R. Civ. P. 6 or Fed. R. Crim. P. 45. Signed by Magistrate Judge Jacquelyn D. Austin on 6/2/2021. (sgri) |
Filing 13 ORDER authorizing service of process by clerk, directing respondent not to answer and directing the petitioner to notify the clerk in writing of any change of address. Signed by Magistrate Judge Jacquelyn D. Austin on 6/2/2021. (Attachments: #1 Petition: 2254) (sgri) |
Filing 12 NOTICE of Change of Address by Robert Austin Morton (Attachments: #1 Envelope) (sgri) |
Filing 10 Filing fee: $ 5.00, receipt number SCX600008872. (sgri) |
Filing 9 ***DOCUMENTS MAILED #8 Proper Form Order & AO 240 placed in U.S. Mail from Greenville Clerks Office to Robert Austin Morton #367915 417 Highland Avenue Sumter, SC 29150. (sgri) |
Filing 8 SECOND PROPER FORM ORDER Case to be brought into proper form by 5/27/2021. Add an additional 3 days only if served by mail or otherwise allowed under Fed. R. Civ. P. 6. Signed by Magistrate Judge Jacquelyn D. Austin on 5/6/2021. (sgri) |
Filing 6 ***DOCUMENTS MAILED #5 Proper Form Order and AO 240 placed in U.S. Mail from Greenville Clerks Office to Robert Austin Morton #367915 417 Highland Avenue Sumter, SC. 29150 (sgri) |
Filing 5 PROPER FORM ORDER Case to be brought into proper form by 5/3/2021. Add an additional 3 days only if served by mail or otherwise allowed under Fed. R. Civ. P. 6. Signed by Magistrate Judge Jacquelyn D. Austin on 4/12/2021. (sgri) |
Filing 2 TRUE DIVISION FOR TRIAL: SPARTANBURG. (sgri) |
Filing 1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus, filed by Robert Austin Morton. (Attachments: #1 Envelope) (sgri) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the South Carolina District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Morton v. State of South Carolina | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Respondent: State of South Carolina | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Petitioner: Robert Austin Morton | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.