Brooks v. Stirling et al
| Emonte A. Brooks |
| Sam Ray, Mark Bethea, Dennis Patterson, Nicholas Marquez, Michael McCall, Emily Anderson, Quanda Abrams, Chelsea Mingo, Cynthia Petty, Annie McCullough, Michael Beady, Mark Hatton, Colie L. Rushton, Edward Tisdale, Jr., Venyke Smith, Elsie Pressley, Joseph Stines, Kenneth Sharp, Arenda Thomas, Raymond Johnson, Aaron Joyner, Bryan P. Stirling and Clive Lopez |
| 8:2021cv01076 |
| April 13, 2021 |
| US District Court for the District of South Carolina |
| Jacquelyn D Austin |
| Sherri A Lydon |
| Prison:Prison Condition |
| 42 U.S.C. § 1983 |
| Both |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on June 2, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 21 NOTICE of Appearance by Evan Michael Sobocinski on behalf of Aaron Joyner (Sobocinski, Evan) |
| Filing 20 Local Rule 26.01 Answers to Interrogatories by Dennis Patterson, Colie L. Rushton, Joseph Stines.(Arthur, Samuel) |
| Filing 19 ANSWER to #1 Complaint, by Dennis Patterson, Colie L. Rushton, Joseph Stines.(Arthur, Samuel) |
| Filing 18 Local Rule 26.01 Answers to Interrogatories by Quanda Abrams, Michael Beady, Mark Bethea, Raymond Johnson, Annie McCullough, Cynthia Petty, Sam Ray, Kenneth Sharp, Arenda Thomas, Edward Tisdale, Jr..(Plyler, Daniel) |
| Filing 17 ANSWER to #1 Complaint, by Quanda Abrams, Michael Beady, Mark Bethea, Raymond Johnson, Annie McCullough, Cynthia Petty, Sam Ray, Kenneth Sharp, Arenda Thomas, Edward Tisdale, Jr..(Plyler, Daniel) |
Filing 16
ORDER REGARDING MEDIATION LEE PRISON RIOT CASES: The Court hereby appoints the Honorable Tommy Russo as the mediator in all of the Lee Prison Riot cases. The parties are directed to initiate contact with Judge Russo to schedule mediation in accordance with the dates outlined in the Court's Scheduling Order for mediation. Signed by Magistrate Judge Jacquelyn D. Austin on 5/19/2021. (sgri)
|
|
Filing 15
ORDER REGARDING RULE 16 CONFERENCE CONSIDERATIONS: A written report shall be jointly provided by the parties in each matter outlining the issues identified above at least ten (10) days after the Rule 26(f) report is filed with the Court. Signed by Magistrate Judge Jacquelyn D. Austin on 5/19/2021. (sgri)
|
| Filing 14 Local Rule 26.01 Answers to Interrogatories by Aaron Joyner.(Ganes, Elloree) |
| Filing 13 ANSWER to #1 Complaint, by Aaron Joyner.(Ganes, Elloree) |
|
Filing 12
TEXT ORDER extending Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(f) conference and report deadlines. A conference of the parties pursuant to Rule 26(f) shall be held no later than 14 days after the date the last Answer has been filed. At the conference, the parties shall confer concerning all matters set forth in Rule 26(f) and whether the schedule set forth in the Courts previously entered Conference and Scheduling Order is appropriate and, if not, what modifications are necessary. Additionally, the parties shall file a Rule 26(f) report and shall make the required initial disclosures under Rule 26(a)(1) no later than 14 days after the Rule 26(f) conference. Signed by Magistrate Judge Jacquelyn D. Austin on 5/18/2021. (sgri)
|
| Filing 11 NOTICE of Appearance by Samuel F Arthur, III on behalf of Dennis Patterson, Colie L. Rushton, Joseph Stines (Arthur, Samuel) (Main Document 11 replaced provided by filing user on 5/18/2021) (sgri). |
| Filing 10 Local Rule 26.01 Answers to Interrogatories by Bryan P. Stirling.(Settana, Daniel) |
| Filing 9 ANSWER to #1 Complaint, by Bryan P. Stirling.(Settana, Daniel) |
|
Filing 8
CONFERENCE AND SCHEDULING ORDER: Rule 26(f) Conference Deadline 6/1/2021, 26(a) Initial Disclosures due by 6/14/2021, Rule 26 Report due by 6/14/2021, Motions to Amend Pleadings due by 7/6/2021, Plaintiffs ID of Expert Witness due by 8/5/2021, Defendants ID of Expert Witnesses Due by 9/7/2021, Records Custodian Affidavit due by 9/7/2021, Discovery due by 11/8/2021, Motions due by 1/7/2022, Mediation Due by 12/8/2021, This case is subject to being called for jury selection and trial thirty (30) days following the issuance of a Report and Recommendation on any motion described in paragraph 9 of this Order, unless otherwise ordered by the Court. Signed by Magistrate Judge Jacquelyn D. Austin on 5/10/2021. (sgri)
|
| Filing 7 Local Rule 26.01 Answers to Interrogatories by Michael McCall.(Thomas, Lisa) |
| Filing 6 ANSWER to #1 Complaint, by Michael McCall.(Thomas, Lisa) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE of Appearance by Lisa Arlene Thomas on behalf of Michael McCall (Thomas, Lisa) |
| Filing 4 Summons Issued as to Quanda Abrams, Emily Anderson, Michael Beady, Mark Bethea, Mark Hatton, Raymond Johnson, Aaron Joyner, Clive Lopez, Nicholas Marquez, Michael McCall, Annie McCullough, Chelsea Mingo, Dennis Patterson, Cynthia Petty, Elsie Pressley, Sam Ray, Colie L. Rushton, Kenneth Sharp, Venyke Smith, Joseph Stines, Bryan P. Stirling, Arenda Thomas, Edward Tisdale, Jr. (sgri) |
| Filing 3 Local Rule 26.01 Answers to Interrogatories by Emonte A. Brooks. (sgri) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Quanda Abrams, Emily Anderson, Michael Beady, Mark Bethea, Mark Hatton, Raymond Johnson, Aaron Joyner, Clive Lopez, Nicholas Marquez, Michael McCall, Annie McCullough, Chelsea Mingo, Dennis Patterson, Cynthia Petty, Elsie Pressley, Sam Ray, Colie L. Rushton, Kenneth Sharp, Venyke Smith, Joseph Stines, Bryan P. Stirling, Arenda Thomas, Edward Tisdale, Jr. ( Filing fee $ 402 receipt number 0420-9767294.), filed by Emonte A. Brooks. Service due by 7/12/2021 (sgri) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the South Carolina District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
