Victoria v. Bodiford
Christopher Lamar Victoria |
Scott Bodiford |
8:2021cv01836 |
June 23, 2021 |
US District Court for the District of South Carolina |
Jacquelyn D Austin |
J Michelle Childs |
Habeas Corpus (General) |
28 U.S.C. ยง 2241 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on July 12, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 13 CERTIFIED MAIL RECEIPT re #7 Order - Habeas-Service-No Answer, served on Attorney General of United States on 7/8/2021. (sgri) |
Filing 11 OBJECTION to #8 Report and Recommendation by Christopher Lamar Victoria. Reply to Objections due by 7/22/2021 Add an additional 3 days only if served by mail or otherwise allowed under Fed. R. Civ. P. 6. (Attachments: #1 Envelope) (sgri) |
Filing 10 ***DOCUMENT MAILED CERTIFIED #7 Order - Habeas-Service-No Answer, #1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus placed in U.S. Mail from Greenville Clerks Office to United States Attorney General 950 Pennsylvania Avenue NW Washington DC 20530 (sgri) |
Filing 9 ***DOCUMENTS MAILED #7 Order - Habeas-Service-No Answer, #8 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION, 6 Order on Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis placed in U.S. Mail from Greenville Clerks Office to Christopher Lamar Victoria Greenville County Detention Center 20 McGee Street Greenville, SC 29601 (sgri) |
Filing 8 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION it is recommended that Petition #1 filed in this action be DISMISSED without requiring the Respondent to file a return. Objections to R&R due by 7/9/2021 Add an additional 3 days only if served by mail or otherwise allowed under Fed. R. Civ. P. 6 or Fed. R. Crim. P. 45. Signed by Magistrate Judge Jacquelyn D. Austin on 6/25/2021. (sgri) |
Filing 7 ORDER authorizing service of process by clerk, directing respondent not to answer and directing the petitioner to notify the clerk in writing of any change of address. (Attachments: #1 Petition: 2254) Signed by Magistrate Judge Jacquelyn D. Austin on 6/25/2021. (sgri) |
Filing 6 TEXT ORDER granting #2 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis Signed by Magistrate Judge Jacquelyn D. Austin on 6/25/2021. (sgri) |
Filing 3 TRUE DIVISION FOR TRIAL: GREENVILLE. (sgri) |
Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis (Restricted Access) by Christopher Lamar Victoria. Response to Motion due by 7/1/2021. Add an additional 3 days only if served by mail or otherwise allowed under Fed. R. Civ. P. 6 or Fed. R. Crim. P. 45. No proposed order. Motions referred to Jacquelyn D. Austin. (sgri) |
Filing 1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus, filed by Christopher Lamar Victoria. (Attachments: #1 Memo in Support) (sgri) (Additional attachment(s) added on 6/23/2021: #2 Envelope) (sgri, ). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the South Carolina District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Victoria v. Bodiford | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Respondent: Scott Bodiford | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Petitioner: Christopher Lamar Victoria | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.