Howell v. Williams et al
Plaintiff: DeVaughn Howell and DeVaughn LeRon Howell
Defendant: Captain Jordan Williams, Sargent Dustin Cragg, Major Carol Holmes and Captain Debo
Case Number: 8:2021cv03328
Filed: October 12, 2021
Court: US District Court for the District of South Carolina
Presiding Judge: Jacquelyn D Austin
Referring Judge: Terry L Wooten
Nature of Suit: Prison:Prison Condition
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jury Demanded By: Defendant
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on February 7, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
December 7, 2021 Filing 25 ***DOCUMENT MAILED #24 Roseboro Order placed in U.S. Mail from Greenville Clerks Office to DeVaughn Howell 331442 Lieber Correctional Institution Edisto A #53 136 Wilborn Avenue Ridgeville, SC 29472 (sgri)
December 7, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 24 ROSEBORO ORDER directing clerk to forward summary judgment explanation to the opposing party and directing that party to respond in 31 days. Response due to #22 MOTION TO DISMISS FOR FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM MOTION to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction Response to Motion due by 1/7/2022. Add an additional 3 days only if served by mail or otherwise allowed under Fed. R. Civ. P. 6 or Fed. R. Crim. P. 45. Signed by Magistrate Judge Jacquelyn D. Austin on 12/7/2021. (sgri)
December 7, 2021 Filing 23 ANSWER to #1 Complaint by Dustin Cragg, Debo, Carol Holmes, Jordan Williams. (Attachments: #1 Certificate of Service)(Dorsel, Christopher)
December 7, 2021 Filing 22 MOTION TO DISMISS FOR FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM , MOTION to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction ( Response to Motion due by 12/21/2021. Add an additional 3 days only if served by mail or otherwise allowed under Fed. R. Civ. P. 6 or Fed. R. Crim. P. 45. ) by Dustin Cragg, Debo, Carol Holmes, Jordan Williams. (Attachments: #1 Memo in Support, #2 Certificate of Service)No proposed order.Motions referred to Jacquelyn D Austin.(Dorsel, Christopher)
December 7, 2021 Filing 21 SUMMONS Returned Executed by DeVaughn Howell. Dustin Cragg served on 11/16/2021, answer due 12/7/2021; Debo served on 11/16/2021, answer due 12/7/2021; Carol Holmes served on 11/16/2021, answer due 12/7/2021; Jordan Williams served on 11/16/2021, answer due 12/7/2021. (sgri)
November 15, 2021 Filing 20 NOTICE of Change of Address by DeVaughn Howell (Attachments: #1 Envelope) (sgri)
November 15, 2021 Filing 19 ***DOCUMENT MAILED 18 TEXT Order on Motion for Issuance of Subpoena, placed in U.S. Mail from Greenville Clerks Office to DeVaughn Howell 331442 Lieber Correctional Institution 136 Wilborn Avenue Ridgeville, SC 29472 (sgri)
November 15, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 18 TEXT ORDER denying #16 motion for issuance of subpoena. Plaintiff seeks evidence that is likely available from the parties in this case. Therefore, Plaintiff should engage in discovery between parties as provided in the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Further, to the extent Plaintiff seeks to subpoena witnesses to testify, his request is premature, as no hearing or trial has been set in this case. Signed by Magistrate Judge Jacquelyn D. Austin on 11/15/2021. (sgri)
November 12, 2021 Filing 17 Letter from DeVaughn Howell. (Attachments: #1 Envelope) (sgri)
November 12, 2021 Filing 16 MOTION for issuance of Subpoena by DeVaughn Howell. Response to Motion due by 11/29/2021. Add an additional 3 days only if served by mail or otherwise allowed under Fed. R. Civ. P. 6 or Fed. R. Crim. P. 45. (Attachments: #1 Envelope) No proposed order. Motions referred to Jacquelyn D. Austin. (sgri)
November 1, 2021 Filing 14 Summons Issued as to Dustin Cragg, Debo, Carol Holmes, Jordan Williams. Service due by 1/31/2022 (sgri) (Main Document 14 replaced on 11/1/2021) (sgri).
October 29, 2021 Filing 13 ***DOCUMENT MAILED #12 Order 1983, placed in U.S. Mail from Greenville Clerks Office to DeVaughn Howell 331442 Lieber Correctional Institution 136 Wilborn Avenue Ridgeville, SC 29472 (rweb, )
October 29, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 12 ORDER authorizing service of process and collection of filing fee. Apprising the defendants of deadline for filing dispositive motions and directing plaintiff to notify the clerk in writing of any change of address. Signed by Magistrate Judge Jacquelyn D. Austin on 10/29/21. (rweb, )
October 18, 2021 Filing 9 ***DOCUMENTS MAILED 8 Order on Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis, #7 Proper Form Order, 4 x USM-285 forms placed in U.S. Mail from Greenville Clerks Office to DeVaughn Howell 331442 Lieber Correctional Institution 136 Wilborn Avenue Ridgeville, SC 29472. (sgri)
October 18, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 8 TEXT ORDER granting #2 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis Signed by Magistrate Judge Jacquelyn D. Austin on 10/18/2021. (sgri)
October 18, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 7 PROPER FORM ORDER Case to be brought into proper form by 11/8/2021. Add an additional 3 days only if served by mail or otherwise allowed under Fed. R. Civ. P. 6. Signed by Magistrate Judge Jacquelyn D. Austin on 10/18/2021. (sgri)
October 15, 2021 Filing 4 TRUE DIVISION FOR TRIAL: CHARLESTON. (sgri)
October 12, 2021 Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis (Restricted Access) by DeVaughn Howell. Response to Motion due by 10/26/2021. Add an additional 3 days only if served by mail or otherwise allowed under Fed. R. Civ. P. 6 or Fed. R. Crim. P. 45. (Attachments: #1 Financial Certificate, #2 Envelope) No proposed order. Motions referred to Jacquelyn D. Austin. (sgri)
October 12, 2021 Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Dustin Cragg, Debo, Carol Holmes, Jordan Williams, filed by DeVaughn Howell. Service due by 1/10/2022 (Attachments: #1 Envelope) (sgri)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the South Carolina District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Howell v. Williams et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: DeVaughn Howell
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: DeVaughn LeRon Howell
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Captain Jordan Williams
Represented By: Christopher Thomas Dorsel
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Sargent Dustin Cragg
Represented By: Christopher Thomas Dorsel
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Major Carol Holmes
Represented By: Christopher Thomas Dorsel
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Captain Debo
Represented By: Christopher Thomas Dorsel
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?