Miller et al v Unknown Claimants
Petitioner: William H Miller and Nancy Miller
Claimant: Unknown Claimants
Case Number: 8:2021cv03348
Filed: October 14, 2021
Court: US District Court for the District of South Carolina
Presiding Judge: Timothy M Cain
Nature of Suit: Marine
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1333
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on November 12, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
November 12, 2021 Filing 18 TEXT ORDER granting #16 Motion to Appear Pro Hac Vice. Attorney Christopher A Abel added for Petitioners. Entered at the direction of the Honorable Timothy M Cain on 11/12/21.(kmca)
November 4, 2021 Filing 16 MOTION to Appear Pro Hac Vice by Christopher A. Abel ( Filing fee $ 350 receipt number ASCDC-10169866) by Nancy Miller, William H Miller. Response to Motion due by 11/18/2021. Add an additional 3 days only if served by mail or otherwise allowed under Fed. R. Civ. P. 6 or Fed. R. Crim. P. 45. (Attachments: #1 Supporting Documents Application for PHV, #2 Exhibit to Application)Proposed order is being emailed to chambers with copy to opposing counsel.(Smith, G) (Main Document 16 replaced on 11/8/2021: to replace with corrected document (converted pdf) as provided by filing user) (kmca). (Additional attachment added on 11/12/2021:as provided by filing user: #3 Certificate of Good Standing Supreme Court of Virginia) (kmca).
November 1, 2021 Filing 14 NOTICE OF COMPLAINT FOR EXONERATION FROM OR LIMITATION OF LIABILITY. (kmca)
November 1, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 13 ORDER granting #6 Motion for Publication as set out. Signed by Honorable Timothy M Cain on 11/1/21. (Attachments: #1 Notice of Complaint)(kmca) (Main Document 13 replaced on 11/1/2021: to correct typo as requested by chambers) (kmca).
November 1, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 12 ORDER granting #6 Motion to Approve Security. The Clerk of the Court shall accept the funds tendered to the Court: security in the amount of FOUR THOUSAND TWO HUNDRED NINETEEN AND 72/100 DOLLARS ($4,219.72) (U.S.), in satisfaction of their requirement to post security for the amount of their interest in the Limitation Vessel, as set forth in their Ad Interim Stipulation for Value (ECF No. #2 ) and One Thousand and 00/100 dollars ($1,000.00) (U.S.) for costs, as set forth in their Stipulation for Costs (ECF No. #3 ). Signed by Honorable Timothy M Cain on 11/1/21.(kmca)
November 1, 2021 Filing 11 TEXT ORDER granting #6 Motion to Stay. Entered at the direction of the Honorable Timothy M Cain on 11/1/21.(kmca)
October 20, 2021 Filing 9 Local Rule 26.01 Answers to Interrogatories by Nancy Miller, William H Miller.(Smith, G)
October 19, 2021 Filing 8 TEXT ORDER. The Court is informed that the Office of the Clerk of Court, following standard procedure, contacted counsel for Plaintiff requesting the Plaintiff comply with Local Rule 26.01 (D.S.C.) but that counsel refused to comply on the grounds that compliance was not mandatory in this action. Having closely reviewed the complaint and the materials submitted by Plaintiff, the Court finds no basis for concluding Plaintiff is exempt from Local Rule 26.01. Accordingly, the Court ORDERS Plaintiff to comply with Local Rule 26.01 by 5:00 pm, Monday, October 25, 2021, or SHOW CAUSE by 5:00 pm, Monday, October 25, 2021, why Plaintiff is exempt. IT IS SO ORDERED. Entered at the direction of the Honorable Timothy M Cain on 10/19/21. (kmca)
October 15, 2021 Filing 6 MOTION to Stay re #2 Stipulation, #1 Complaint, #3 Stipulation by Nancy Miller, William H Miller. Response to Motion due by 10/29/2021. Add an additional 3 days only if served by mail or otherwise allowed under Fed. R. Civ. P. 6 or Fed. R. Crim. P. 45. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order Order Accepting Security, #2 Proposed Order Order of Publication & Stay, #3 Exhibit Notice)Proposed order is being emailed to chambers with copy to opposing counsel.(Smith, G)
October 14, 2021 Filing 3 STIPULATION FOR COSTS by Nancy Miller, William H Miller. (arut)
October 14, 2021 Filing 2 AD INTERIM STIPULATION FOR VALUE by Nancy Miller, William H Miller. (arut)
October 14, 2021 Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Unknown Claimants ( Filing fee $ 402 receipt number 0420-10124557.), filed by William H Miller, Nancy Miller. Service due by 1/12/2022. (Attachments: #1 Smith Affidavit)(arut) (Attachment 1 replaced on 10/15/2021 with corrected document) (arut).

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the South Carolina District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Miller et al v Unknown Claimants
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: William H Miller
Represented By: G Michael Smith
Represented By: Christopher A Abel
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: Nancy Miller
Represented By: G Michael Smith
Represented By: Christopher A Abel
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Claimant: Unknown Claimants
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?