Assaf v. Trans Union LLC
| Hussein Assaf |
| Trans Union LLC |
| 8:2021cv04060 |
| December 16, 2021 |
| US District Court for the District of South Carolina |
| Henry M Herlong |
| Other Statutory Actions |
| 15 U.S.C. ยง 1681 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on January 28, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 14 DELETION OF DOCKET ENTRY NUMBER #9 Consent Motion. Reason: re-filed by attorney to correct pleading and event. Corrected Filing Document Number #11 Letter Extending Time to Answer. Modified filing date to that of original filing: 1/28/22. (kmca) |
| Filing 11 LETTER EXTENDING TIME TO ANSWER. Trans Union LLC answer due 2/18/2022. (Johnson, Wilbur) Modified on 2/1/2022: to update answer date (kmca). Modified on 2/1/2022: to update date filed (kmca). |
| Filing 10 Local Rule 26.01 Answers to Interrogatories by Trans Union LLC.(Johnson, Wilbur) |
| Filing 8 TEXT ORDER granting #5 Motion to Appear Pro Hac Vice; granting #6 Motion to Appear Pro Hac Vice. Attorneys Leonard A. Bennett and Craig C. Marchiando added for Plaintiff. Entered at the direction of the Honorable Henry M Herlong, Jr on 1/5/22.(kmca) |
| Filing 7 Summons Reissued as to Trans Union LLC with corrected address. (kmca) |
| Filing 6 MOTION to Appear Pro Hac Vice by Craig C. Marchiando ( Filing fee $ 350 receipt number ASCDC-10261087) by Hussein Assaf. Response to Motion due by 1/18/2022. Add an additional 3 days only if served by mail or otherwise allowed under Fed. R. Civ. P. 6 or Fed. R. Crim. P. 45. (Attachments: #1 Affidavit)Proposed order is being emailed to chambers with copy to opposing counsel.(Cauley, Penny) |
| Filing 5 MOTION to Appear Pro Hac Vice by Leonard A. Bennett ( Filing fee $ 350 receipt number ASCDC-10261062) by Hussein Assaf. Response to Motion due by 1/18/2022. Add an additional 3 days only if served by mail or otherwise allowed under Fed. R. Civ. P. 6 or Fed. R. Crim. P. 45. (Attachments: #1 Affidavit)Proposed order is being emailed to chambers with copy to opposing counsel.(Cauley, Penny) |
| Filing 4 Summons Issued as to Trans Union LLC. (kmca) |
| Filing 3 Local Rule 26.01 Answers to Interrogatories by Hussein Assaf.(kmca) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Trans Union LLC (Filing fee $402 receipt number ASCDC-10240363), filed by Hussein Assaf. Service due by 3/16/2022.(kmca) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the South Carolina District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Assaf v. Trans Union LLC | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Hussein Assaf | |
| Represented By: | Penny Hays Cauley |
| Represented By: | William Kyle Geddings |
| Represented By: | Craig C Marchiando |
| Represented By: | Leonard A Bennett |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Trans Union LLC | |
| Represented By: | Wilbur Eugene Johnson |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
