Mathis v. Anderson County et al
Grayson Mathis, Sr |
Anderson County, Anderson County Sheriffs Office, Anderson, City of, Anderson Police Department, City of, Anderson City Council, City of, Chief Jim Stewart, Sheriff Chad McBride, David McCuen, Officer Joseph Chapman, Zack Lucas, Craig Gardner, Bryce Jackson, Jeff Roberts, Tony Stewart, Beatrice Thompson, Terence Roberts, Kyle Newton, Don Chapman, John Doe 1 and John Doe 2 |
8:2022cv00234 |
January 26, 2022 |
US District Court for the District of South Carolina |
Donald C Coggins |
Kevin McDonald |
Prisoner: Civil Rights |
42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr (Other) |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on March 21, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 16 DELETION OF DOCKET ENTRY NUMBER 16, 17, 18 Reason: Discovery documents, 26(a)(1) interrogatories are not filed with the court. (kric, ) |
|
|
Filing 13 Consent MOTION to Amend/Correct Scheduling Order by Anderson County, Anderson County Sheriffs Office, Bryce Jackson, Chad McBride. Response to Motion due by 3/23/2022. Add an additional 3 days only if served by mail or otherwise allowed under Fed. R. Civ. P. 6 or Fed. R. Crim. P. 45. Proposed order is being emailed to chambers with copy to opposing counsel.Motions referred to Kevin McDonald.(Turner, Charles) |
Filing 12 Local Rule 26.01 Answers to Interrogatories by Grayson Mathis, Sr.(Myers, Thad) |
Filing 11 MEDIATION ORDER Mediation Due by 7/20/2022, Signed by Honorable Donald C Coggins, Jr on 1/28/2022. (kric, ) |
|
Filing 9 NOTICE and Acknowledgment of receipt of Notice of Removal by Clerk of Court for Anderson County. (Attachments: #1 State Court Documents Acknowledgement of Receipt of Notice of Removal)(Turner, Charles) |
Filing 8 Local Rule 26.01 Answers to Interrogatories by Anderson City Council, City of, Anderson Police Department, City of, Anderson, City of, Don Chapman, Joseph Chapman, Craig Gardner, John Doe 2, Zack Lucas, David McCuen, Kyle Newton, Jeff Roberts, Terence Roberts, Jim Stewart, Tony Stewart, Beatrice Thompson. (Attachments: #1 Certificate of Service Service of Local Rule 26.01 Answers to Interrogatories)(Logan, James) |
Filing 7 ANSWER to Complaint by Anderson City Council, City of, Anderson Police Department, City of, Anderson, City of, Don Chapman, Joseph Chapman, Craig Gardner, John Doe 2, Zack Lucas, David McCuen, Kyle Newton, Jeff Roberts, Terence Roberts, Jim Stewart, Tony Stewart, Beatrice Thompson.(Logan, James) |
Filing 5 NOTICE informing that plaintiff's LR26.01 interrogatories are due within 14 days re #1 Notice of Removal. (kric, ) |
Filing 4 ANSWER to Complaint (Notice of Removal) by Anderson County, Anderson County Sheriffs Office, Bryce Jackson, Chad McBride. (Attachments: #1 Certificate of Service)(abuc) |
Filing 3 Local Rule 26.01 Answers to Interrogatories by Anderson County, Anderson County Sheriffs Office, Bryce Jackson, Chad McBride.(abuc) (Additional attachment(s) added on 1/26/2022: #1 Certificate of Service) (abuc, ). |
Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Anderson County Court of Common Pleas, case number 2021-CP-04-02384. (Filing fee $ 402 receipt number ASCDC-10299999), filed by Anderson County, Bryce Jackson, Chad McBride, Anderson County Sheriffs Office. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - Filed Summons & Complaint in State Court, #2 Exhibit B - Filed Affidavits of Service, #3 Exhibit C - Co-Defendant's Written Permission for Removal, #4 Certificate of Service)(abuc) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the South Carolina District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.