Reese et al v. Dollar Tree Stores Inc
Sandra Reese and Norman Reese |
Dollar Tree Stores Inc and Only One Dollar Inc |
8:2022cv00339 |
February 3, 2022 |
US District Court for the District of South Carolina |
Henry M Herlong |
P.I.: Other |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 |
Both |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on March 9, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 17 Joint Local Rule 26.03 Answers to Interrogatories by Dollar Tree Stores Inc, Norman Reese, Sandra Reese.(Polston, Makenzie) Modified on 3/10/2022: to add joint filers as listed (kmca). |
Filing 16 MEDIATION ORDER. Mediation Due by 8/15/2022. Signed by Honorable Henry M Herlong, Jr on 2/28/22. (kmca) |
Filing 15 AMENDED CONFERENCE AND SCHEDULING ORDER: Motions to Amend Pleadings due by 4/8/2022, Plaintiffs ID of Expert Witness due by 5/9/2022, Defendants ID of Expert Witnesses Due by 7/8/2022, Records Custodian Affidavit due by 7/8/2022, Discovery due by 8/8/2022, Motions due by 8/22/2022, Rule 26(a)(3) Disclosures due by 10/3/2022, Motion in Limine due by 10/20/2022, Pretrial Briefs due by 10/27/2022, Jury Selection Deadline 11/3/2022. Signed by Honorable Henry M Herlong, Jr on 2/28/22. (kmca) |
Filing 14 DELETION OF DOCKET ENTRY NUMBER #13 Proposed Consent Amended Scheduling Order titled: Proposed Consent Rule 26 Outline of Discovery Plan. Reason: the proposed amended scheduling order should have been attached to entry #12 26(f) Report. (kmca) |
Filing 12 Rule 26(f) Report by Dollar Tree Stores Inc, Sandra Reese, Norman Reese.(Polston, Makenzie) (Additional attachment added on 2/28/2022: #1 Proposed Amended Scheduling Order). Modified on 2/28/2022: to add joint filers as listed (kmca). |
Filing 11 Local Rule 26.01 Answers to Interrogatories by Norman Reese, Sandra Reese.(Carter, Haylea) (Main Document 11 replaced on 2/23/2022: to replace with corrected signature as provided by filing user) (kmca). |
Filing 10 NOTICE of Appearance by Haylea Nicole Carter on behalf of Norman Reese, Sandra Reese (Carter, Haylea) (Main Document 10 replaced on 2/23/2022: to replace with signed document as provided by filing user) (kmca). |
Filing 9 CONFERENCE AND SCHEDULING ORDER: Rule 26(f) Conference Deadline 2/28/2022, 26(a) Initial Disclosures due by 3/14/2022, Rule 26 Report due by 3/14/2022, Motions to Amend Pleadings due by 4/8/2022, Plaintiffs ID of Expert Witness due by 5/9/2022, Defendants ID of Expert Witnesses Due by 6/7/2022, Records Custodian Affidavit due by 6/7/2022, Discovery due by 7/7/2022, Motions due by 7/21/2022, Rule 26(a)(3) Disclosures due by 9/2/2022, Motion in Limine due by 9/20/2022, Pretrial Briefs due by 9/27/2022, Jury Selection Deadline 10/4/2022. Signed by Honorable Henry M Herlong, Jr on 2/7/22. (kmca) |
Filing 8 ANSWER to Complaint by Dollar Tree Stores Inc.(Polston, Makenzie) |
Filing 6 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE by Dollar Tree Stores Inc re #3 Local Rule 26.01 Answers to Interrogatories, #1 Notice of Removal, #4 Disclosure Statement Pursuant to FRCP 7.1. (arut) |
Filing 4 DISCLOSURE STATEMENT PURSUANT TO FRCP 7.1 by Dollar Tree Stores Inc.(arut) |
Filing 3 Local Rule 26.01 Answers to Interrogatories by Dollar Tree Stores Inc.(arut) |
Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Greenwood County Court of Common Pleas, case number 2022CP2400004. (Filing fee $402 receipt number ASCDC-10318288), filed by Dollar Tree Stores Inc. (Attachments: #1 State Court Documents)(arut) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the South Carolina District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.