McKinney Dodge Chrysler Jeep Inc v. Mazda Motor of America Inc
| McKinney Dodge Chrysler Jeep Inc doing business as McKinney Mazda |
| Mazda Motor of America Inc doing business as Mazda North American Operations |
| Mazda Motor of America Inc |
| McKinney Dodge Chrysler Jeep Inc |
| 8:2022cv00496 |
| February 15, 2022 |
| US District Court for the District of South Carolina |
| Henry M Herlong |
| Contract: Franchise |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on August 3, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 14
TEXT ORDER granting #13 Motion for Extension of Time to File Reply to #10 Counterclaim. Replies due by 4/29/2022. Entered at the direction of Honorable Henry M Herlong, Jr on 4/4/22. (sfla)
|
|
Filing 13
Consent MOTION for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply as to #10 Answer to Complaint, Counterclaim by McKinney Dodge Chrysler Jeep Inc. Response to Motion due by 4/18/2022. Add an additional 3 days only if served by mail or otherwise allowed under Fed. R. Civ. P. 6 or Fed. R. Crim. P. 45. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order Granting Extension)Proposed order is being emailed to chambers with copy to opposing counsel.(Martin, Bradford) Modified on 4/4/2022: to remove duplicate text (order order) (kmca).
|
|
Filing 12
Letter from Bradford N. Martin. (Martin, Bradford) (Main Document 12 replaced on 3/22/2022: to replace with corrected document (converted pdf) as provided by filing user) (kmca).
|
|
Filing 11
CONFERENCE AND SCHEDULING ORDER: Rule 26(f) Conference Deadline 4/7/2022, 26(a) Initial Disclosures due by 4/21/2022, Rule 26 Report due by 4/21/2022, Motions to Amend Pleadings due by 5/17/2022, Plaintiffs ID of Expert Witness due by 6/16/2022, Defendants ID of Expert Witnesses Due by 7/18/2022, Records Custodian Affidavit due by 7/18/2022, Discovery due by 8/17/2022, Motions due by 8/31/2022, Rule 26(a)(3) Disclosures due by 10/14/2022, Motion in Limine due by 10/31/2022, Pretrial Briefs due by 11/7/2022, Jury Selection Deadline 11/14/2022. Signed by Honorable Henry M Herlong, Jr on 3/18/22. (kmca)
|
|
Filing 10
ANSWER to Complaint , COUNTERCLAIM against McKinney Dodge Chrysler Jeep Inc by Mazda Motor of America Inc. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Dealer Agreement)(McFarland, Steven)
|
|
Filing 7
Plaintiff's Local Rule 26.01 Answers to Interrogatories by McKinney Dodge Chrysler Jeep Inc.(Martin, Bradford)
|
|
Filing 6
TEXT ORDER granting #5 Consent Motion for Extension of Time to Answer or Otherwise Plead re #1 Notice of Removal. Mazda Motor of America Inc answer due 3/18/2022. Entered at the direction of the Honorable Henry M Herlong, Jr on 2/28/22.(kmca)
|
|
Filing 5
Consent MOTION for Extension of Time to Answer or Otherwise Plead in Response to Plaintiff's Complaint by Mazda Motor of America Inc. Response to Motion due by 3/11/2022. Add an additional 3 days only if served by mail or otherwise allowed under Fed. R. Civ. P. 6 or Fed. R. Crim. P. 45. Proposed order is being emailed to chambers with copy to opposing counsel.(McFarland, Steven)
|
|
Filing 3
Local Rule 26.01 Answers to Interrogatories by Mazda Motor of America Inc.(kmca)
|
|
Filing 1
NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Pickens County Court of Common Pleas, case number 2022-CP-39-00194. (Filing fee $402 receipt number ASCDC-10339532), filed by Mazda Motor of America Inc. (Attachments: #1 State Court Documents including Motion for Ex Parte Temporary Restraining Order and/or Preliminary Injunction and Order Denying Motion.)(kmca)
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the South Carolina District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
