Allen v. Stumbo et al
Plaintiff: Aaron Allen
Defendant: David Stumbo and Penny B. Carson
Case Number: 8:2022cv01045
Filed: March 31, 2022
Court: US District Court for the District of South Carolina
Presiding Judge: Jacquelyn D Austin
Referring Judge: Timothy M Cain
Nature of Suit: Prisoner: Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights, State Filers
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on July 5, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
April 18, 2022 Filing 14 OBJECTION to #12 Report and Recommendation by Aaron Allen. Reply to Objections due by 5/2/2022 Add an additional 3 days only if served by mail or otherwise allowed under Fed. R. Civ. P. 6. (Attachments: #1 Attachments, #2 Envelope) (sgri)
April 4, 2022 Filing 13 ***DOCUMENTS MAILED #12 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION, 11 TEXT Order on Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis, #10 Order placed in U.S. Mail from Greenville Clerks Office to Aaron Allen 1211-B McCormick Highway Greenwood, SC 29646 (sgri)
April 4, 2022 Filing 12 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION it is recommended that the District Court DISMISS this action pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1915 without leave to amend and without issuance and service of process. Objections to R&R due by 4/18/2022 Add an additional 3 days only if served by mail or otherwise allowed under Fed. R. Civ. P. 6 or Fed. R. Crim. P. 45. Signed by Magistrate Judge Jacquelyn D. Austin on 4/4/2022. (sgri)
April 4, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 11 TEXT ORDER granting #4 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. Signed by Magistrate Judge Jacquelyn D. Austin on 4/4/2022. (sgri)
April 4, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 10 ORDER directing Clerk not to authorize service and advising plaintiff (or petitioner) to notify Clerk in writing of any change of address. Signed by Magistrate Judge Jacquelyn D. Austin on 4/4/2022. (sgri)
April 1, 2022 Filing 8 TRUE DIVISION FOR TRIAL: ANDERSON. (sgri)
March 31, 2022 Filing 4 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis (Restricted Access) by Aaron Allen. Response to Motion due by 4/14/2022. Add an additional 3 days only if served by mail or otherwise allowed under Fed. R. Civ. P. 6 or Fed. R. Crim. P. 45. No proposed order. Motions referred to Jacquelyn D. Austin. (sgri)
March 31, 2022 Filing 3 Local Rule 26.01 Answers to Interrogatories by Aaron Allen. (sgri)
March 31, 2022 Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Penny B. Carson, David Stumbo, filed by Aaron Allen. Service due by 6/29/2022 (Attachments: #1 Additional Attachments to Complaint) (sgri)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the South Carolina District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Allen v. Stumbo et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Aaron Allen
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: David Stumbo
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Penny B. Carson
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?