Gregory v. Commissioner of Social Security Administration
| Preston George Gregory, Jr |
| Commissioner of Social Security Administration |
| Social Security Administrative Record and US Attorney - Social Security Noticing |
| 8:2022cv04118 |
| November 17, 2022 |
| US District Court for the District of South Carolina |
| Jacquelyn D Austin |
| Donald C Coggins |
| Social Security: DIWC/DIWW |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC) |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on November 30, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 10 TEXT ORDER: Effective December 1, 2022, the court is rescinding Local Civ. Rule 83.VII.04, in response to new Supplemental Rules governing deadlines in Social Security cases. As a result, the deadline for filing the Commissioners answer will be reduced from 120 to 60 days. In anticipation of requests for extension to file Answers, and in the interests of justice and judicial economy, the undersigned hereby Orders that the Answer deadline calculated in this case at the time of filing shall remain in effect. Entered at the direction of Magistrate Judge Jacquelyn D Austin on 11/30/22.(arut) |
Filing 9
ORDER REFERRING CASE to Magistrate Judge Jacquelyn D Austin. Signed by Honorable Donald C Coggins, Jr on 11/30/22. (arut)
|
| Filing 8 CONSENT to Jurisdiction by US Magistrate Judge by Preston George Gregory, Jr.. (Clardy, Timothy) |
| Filing 7 TEXT ORDER granting #3 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. Entered at the direction of Magistrate Judge Jacquelyn D Austin on 11/22/22.(arut) |
|
Filing 6
TEXT ORDER: Directing the parties' attention to the Court's Standing Order on All 42 U.S.C. 405(g) Social Security Disability Appeals Assigned to Judge Donald C. Coggins, Jr., located on the District Court's website. Within 30 days of the date of this Text Order, Plaintiff's counsel is directed to file either a (1) signed and completed Notice, Consent, and Reference of Civil Action to a Magistrate Judge form, or (2) status report informing the Court that Plaintiff does not consent to disposition of this action by Magistrate Judge. (Status Report due by 12/19/2022.) Entered at the direction of Honorable Donald C Coggins, Jr on 11/18/22. (arut)
|
| Filing 5 Notice: Social Security Case Service. Pursuant to Local Rule 83.VII.02, the Clerk has issued a Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) using the Case Management and Electronic Case Filing (CM/ECF) system, notifying the appropriate Regional Social Security Administration Office of the General Counsel and the United States Attorney's Office of the case. No summonses shall issue. Answer due from Commissioner of Social Security Administration on 3/20/2023. (arut, ) |
| Filing 3 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis (Restricted Access) by Preston George Gregory, Jr. Response to Motion due by 12/1/2022. Add an additional 3 days only if served by mail or otherwise allowed under Fed. R. Civ. P. 6 or Fed. R. Crim. P. 45. No proposed order. Motions referred to Jacquelyn D Austin.(arut) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Commissioner of Social Security Administration Clerk's Note: See 28:636(b)(1)(C)(4)(c)(1) and Local Rule 83.VII.03 regarding Consent to Proceed before Magistrate Judge in Social Security cases. Consent to Proceed before Magistrate Judge forms are available on the Court's website., filed by Preston George Gregory, Jr.(arut) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the South Carolina District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
