Williams v. Wright et al
| Jahmell Williams and Jahmell Raheem Williams |
| Lt Ms Wright, Ms Hendrix and Warden Ms James |
| 8:2022cv04265 |
| November 28, 2022 |
| US District Court for the District of South Carolina |
| Jacquelyn D Austin |
| Cameron McGowan Currie |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights, State Filers |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on January 17, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 24 ANSWER to #1 Complaint by Ms Hendrix, Ms James. (Attachments: #1 Certificate of Service)(Balthazor, Peter) |
| Filing 22 ***DOCUMENT MAILED #20 Order 1983, placed in U.S. Mail from Greenville Clerks Office to Jahmell Williams 320676 Kershaw Correctional Institution HA257 4848 Goldmine Highway Kershaw, SC 29067 (rweb, ) |
| Filing 21 Summons Issued as to Ms Wright. (rweb, ) |
Filing 20
ORDER authorizing service of process. Apprising the defendants of deadline for filing dispositive motions and directing plaintiff to notify the clerk in writing of any change of address. Signed by Magistrate Judge Jacquelyn D Austin on 1/23/23. (Attachments: #1 Complaint)(rweb, )
|
| Filing 19 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Jahmell Williams. Ms Hendrix served on 1/4/2023, answer due 1/25/2023; Ms James served on 1/4/2023, answer due 1/25/2023. (rweb, ) |
| Filing 16 ***DOCUMENT MAILED #14 Order, #12 unexecuted USM-285 form, blank summons and blank USM-285 form placed in U.S. Mail from Greenville Clerks Office to Jahmell Williams 320676 Kershaw Correctional Institution HA257 4848 Goldmine Highway Kershaw, SC 29067 (rweb, ) |
|
Filing 14
BETTER ADDRESS ORDER FILED. Signed by Magistrate Judge Jacquelyn D Austin on 1/13/23. (rweb, ) (Main Document 14 replaced on 1/13/2023) (rweb, ). Modified on 1/13/2023 to correct date (rweb, ).
|
| Filing 12 Summons Returned Unexecuted (Restricted Access) by Jahmell Williams as to Ms Wright. (rweb, ) Modified on 1/12/2023 to edit text (rweb, ). |
| Filing 10 ***DOCUMENT MAILED #7 Order 1983, 9 Order on Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis placed in U.S. Mail from Greenville Clerks Office to Jahmell Williams 320676 Kershaw Correctional Institution 4848 Goldmine Highway Kershaw, SC 29067 (rweb, ) |
|
Filing 9
TEXT ORDER granting #2 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. Signed by Magistrate Judge Jacquelyn D Austin on 12/5/22.(rweb, )
|
| Filing 8 Summons Issued as to Ms Hendrix, Ms James, Ms Wright. (rweb, ) |
|
Filing 7
ORDER authorizing service of process and collection of filing fee. Plaintiff has incurred a debt to the U.S.A. in the amount of $350. Apprising the defendants of deadline for filing dispositive motions and directing plaintiff to notify the clerk in writing of any change of address. Signed by Magistrate Judge Jacquelyn D Austin on 12/5/22. (rweb, )
|
| Filing 4 TRUE DIVISION FOR TRIAL: Columbia. (rweb, ) |
| Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis (Restricted Access) by Jahmell Williams. Response to Motion due by 12/12/2022. Add an additional 3 days only if served by mail or otherwise allowed under Fed. R. Civ. P. 6 or Fed. R. Crim. P. 45. (Attachments: #1 Financial Certificate, #2 Exhibit)No proposed order.Motions referred to Jacquelyn D Austin.(rweb, ) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Ms Hendrix, Ms James, Ms Wright, filed by Jahmell Williams. Service due by 2/27/2023 (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(rweb, ) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the South Carolina District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
