Simmons v. Kershaw Correctional Institution
Petitioner: Rodney Alexander Simmons
Respondent: Warden Kershaw Correctional Institution and Warden of McDougall Correctional Institution
Case Number: 8:2022cv04568
Filed: December 19, 2022
Court: US District Court for the District of South Carolina
Presiding Judge: Jacquelyn D Austin
Referring Judge: David C Norton
Nature of Suit: Habeas Corpus (General)
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on January 24, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
January 24, 2023 Filing 12 ***DOCUMENT MAILED #9 Order - Habeas-Service-No Answer, #11 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION re #1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus filed by Rodney Alexander Simmons placed in U.S. Mail from Greenville Clerks Office to Rodney Alexander Simmons 343814 McDougall Correctional Institution 1516 Old Gillard Road Ridgeville, SC 29472 (rweb, )
January 24, 2023 Filing 11 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION; it is recommended that this action be dismissed without prejudice and without requiring the Respondent to file an answer or return. Objections to R&R due by 2/7/2023. Add an additional 3 days only if served by mail or otherwise allowed under Fed. R. Civ. P. 6 or Fed. R. Crim. P. 45. Signed by Magistrate Judge Jacquelyn D Austin on 1/24/23. (rweb, )
January 24, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 9 ORDER authorizing service of process by clerk, directing respondent not to answer and directing the petitioner to notify the clerk in writing of any change of address. Signed by Magistrate Judge Jacquelyn D Austin on 1/24/23. (rweb, )
January 20, 2023 Filing 7 Filing fee: $ 5, receipt number 600009466 (rweb, )
December 27, 2022 Filing 6 ***DOCUMENT MAILED #5 Proper Form Order and IFP application placed in U.S. Mail from Greenville Clerks Office to Rodney Alexander Simmons 343814 McDougall Correctional Institution 1516 Old Gillard Road Ridgeville, SC 29472 (rweb, )
December 27, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 5 PROPER FORM ORDER Case to be brought into proper form by 1/17/2023. Add an additional 3 days only if served by mail or otherwise allowed under Fed. R. Civ. P. 6. Signed by Magistrate Judge Jacquelyn D Austin on 12/27/22. (rweb, )
December 19, 2022 Filing 2 TRUE DIVISION FOR TRIAL: Charleston. (rweb, ) Modified on 12/22/2022 to correct division (rweb, ).
December 19, 2022 Filing 1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus, filed by Rodney Alexander Simmons. (Attachments: #1 Supporting Documents, #2 Envelope)(rweb, )

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the South Carolina District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Simmons v. Kershaw Correctional Institution
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: Rodney Alexander Simmons
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: Warden Kershaw Correctional Institution
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: Warden of McDougall Correctional Institution
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?