Everett v. Chaplin Atwood et al
Christopher Allen Everett and Christopher Alan Everett |
Chaplin Atwood, Nurse Eden, United Manager Elliot, J. Ruben Long Detention Center, Horry County Jail and Unit Manager Elliot |
8:2023cv00603 |
February 13, 2023 |
US District Court for the District of South Carolina |
Jacquelyn D Austin |
David C Norton |
Prison:Prison Condition |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights, State Filers |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on March 17, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 12 ***DOCUMENT MAILED #10 Order on Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis,,,, Order on Report and Recommendation,,, placed in U.S. Mail from Greenville Clerks Office to Christopher Alan Everett J Reuben Long Detention Center 4150 J Reuben Long Ave Conway, SC 29526 (rweb, ) |
Filing 10 ORDER denying #4 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis; affirming #7 Report and Recommendation. Plaintiff is hereby ordered to pay the filing fee of $402 within twenty-one (21) days from the date of this order. If plaintiff pays the filing fee, this matter shall be returned to the Magistrate Judge for further initial review. If plaintiff fails to pay the filing fee within twenty-one days, this case shall be dismissed without prejudice pursuant to the three strikes rule of 28 U.S.C. 1915(g), and the Clerk of Court shall enter the required judgment at the close of the twenty-one day period permitted for payment of this filing fee. Signed by Honorable David C Norton on 3/17/2023.(eric, ) |
Filing 8 ***DOCUMENT MAILED #7 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION re #4 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis (Restricted Access) filed by Christopher Alan Everett, #6 Proper Form Order, placed in U.S. Mail from Greenville Clerks Office to Christopher Alan Everett J Reuben Long Detention Center 4150 J Reuben Long Ave Conway, SC 29526 with blank summons and blank USM285 forms. (kric, ) |
Filing 7 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION. It is recommended that Plaintiff's motion to proceed in forma pauperis [Doc. 4] be DENIED. It is further recommended that Plaintiff be given twenty-one (21) days from the date the United States District Judge rules on this Report and Recommendation to pay the filing fee of four hundred and two dollars ($402) and that the Clerk of Court withhold entry of judgment until such time for payment expires. Objections to R&R due by 3/8/2023 Add an additional 3 days only if served by mail or otherwise allowed under Fed. R. Civ. P. 6 or Fed. R. Crim. P. 45. Signed by Magistrate Judge Jacquelyn D Austin on 2/22/2023. (kric, ) |
Filing 6 PROPER FORM ORDER Case to be brought into proper form by 3/15/2023. Add an additional 3 days only if served by mail or otherwise allowed under Fed. R. Civ. P. 6. Signed by Magistrate Judge Jacquelyn D Austin on 2/22/2023. (kric, ) |
Filing 4 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis (Restricted Access) by Christopher Allen Everett. Response to Motion due by 2/27/2023. Add an additional 3 days only if served by mail or otherwise allowed under Fed. R. Civ. P. 6 or Fed. R. Crim. P. 45. (Attachments: #1 Envelope)No proposed order.Motions referred to Jacquelyn D Austin.(rweb, ) |
Filing 2 TRUE DIVISION FOR TRIAL: Florence. (rweb, ) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Chaplin Atwood, Horry County Jail, J. Ruben Long Detention Center, Nurse Eden, United Manager Elliot, filed by Christopher Allen Everett. Service due by 5/15/2023 (Attachments: #1 Envelope, best scan possible (rweb, ) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the South Carolina District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.