Metz v. City of Easley South Carolina
| George D Metz, II |
| City of Easley South Carolina |
| 8:2023cv01159 |
| March 23, 2023 |
| US District Court for the District of South Carolina |
| Donald C Coggins |
| Kevin McDonald |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights Act |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on May 1, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 14 ***DOCUMENT MAILED #13 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION placed in U.S. Mail from Greenville Clerks Office to George D Metz, II 4980 SE 140th Street Summerfield, FL 34491 (kric, ) |
| Filing 13 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION IT IS RECOMMENDED that the plaintiff's motions to proceed in forma pauperis (docs. 3; 10) be denied. Should the United States District Judge assigned to this case adopt this recommendation, it is recommended that the plaintiff be provided twenty-one (21) days to pay the full filing fee of $402.00 or the case will be dismissed. Objections to R&R due by 5/23/2023 Add an additional 3 days only if served by mail or otherwise allowed under Fed. R. Civ. P. 6 or Fed. R. Crim. P. 45. Signed by Magistrate Judge Kevin McDonald on 5/9/2023. (kric, ) |
| Filing 10 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis (Restricted Access) by George D Metz, II. Response to Motion due by 5/12/2023. Add an additional 3 days only if served by mail or otherwise allowed under Fed. R. Civ. P. 6 or Fed. R. Crim. P. 45. (Attachments: #1 Envelope)No proposed order.Motions referred to Kevin McDonald.(kric, ) |
| Filing 9 ***DOCUMENT MAILED #8 Proper Form Order, IFP (AO 239) and USM 285 form placed in U.S. Mail from Greenville Clerks Office to George D Metz, II 4980 SE 140th Street Summerfield, FL 34491 (rweb, ) |
Filing 8
PROPER FORM ORDER; Case to be brought into proper form by 4/26/2023. Add an additional 3 days only if served by mail or otherwise allowed under Fed. R. Civ. P. 6. Signed by Magistrate Judge Kevin McDonald on 4/5/23. (rweb, )
|
| Filing 4 Local Rule 26.01 Answers to Interrogatories by George D Metz, II. (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(kric, ) |
| Filing 3 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis (Restricted Access) by George D Metz, II. Response to Motion due by 4/6/2023. Add an additional 3 days only if served by mail or otherwise allowed under Fed. R. Civ. P. 6 or Fed. R. Crim. P. 45. (Attachments: #1 Envelope)No proposed order.Motions referred to Kevin McDonald.(kric, ) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against George D Metz, II, filed by George D Metz, II. Service due by 6/21/2023 (Attachments: #1 City of Easley Ordinance 2022-33, #2 Envelope)(kric, ) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the South Carolina District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Metz v. City of Easley South Carolina | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: George D Metz, II | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: City of Easley South Carolina | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
