Patel et al v. Ur Jaddou
| Alpeshkumar Narandas Patel, Umiyaben Alpeshkumar Patel, DAP and BAP |
| Ur Jaddou |
| 8:2023cv01420 |
| April 7, 2023 |
| US District Court for the District of South Carolina |
| Bruce Howe Hendricks |
| Other Immigration Actions |
| 05 U.S.C. ยง 551 Administrative Procedure Act |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on June 2, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 7 DELETION OF DOCKET ENTRY NUMBER 5 Reason: per attorney request. Corrected Filing Document Number #6 . (alew, ) |
| Filing 6 SUMMONS Returned Executed Corrected by Alpeshkumar Narandas Patel, BAP, DAP, Umiyaben Alpeshkumar Patel. All Defendants. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A: Proof of Service)(Banias, Bradley) (Main Document 6 replaced on 6/2/2023) (alew, ). Modified on 6/2/2023 to replace with corrected document (removed "corrected" designation) (alew, ). |
| Filing 4 Summons Issued as to Ur Jaddou. U.S. Attorney and U.S. Attorney General. (Attachments: #1 Summons, #2 Summons)(arut) |
| Filing 3 Local Rule 26.01 Answers to Interrogatories by BAP, DAP, Alpeshkumar Narandas Patel, Umiyaben Alpeshkumar Patel.(arut) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Ur Jaddou, U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services ( Filing fee $ 402 receipt number ASCDC-11037559.), filed by Alpeshkumar Narandas Patel, BAP, DAP, Umiyaben Alpeshkumar Patel. Service due by 7/6/2023. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A; BFD Policies, #2 Exhibit B; DHS Report)(arut) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the South Carolina District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
