Findley v. Fox News Corporation et al
| Darrell Allen Findley |
| Fox News Channel, Fox News Corporation, Kendra Kent and Unknown Owner |
| 8:2023cv01917 |
| May 8, 2023 |
| US District Court for the District of South Carolina |
| Richard M Gergel |
| Shiva V Hodges |
| Assault Libel & Slander |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2674 Federal Tort Claims Act |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on July 17, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 13 ***DOCUMENTS MAILED #11 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION re #8 Amended Complaint filed by Darrell Allen Findley and 12 Transfer of Case Management, placed in U.S. Mail from Columbia Clerks Office to Darrell Allen Findley, 2023000858, Anderson County Detention Center, 1009 David Lee Coffe Place Rd., Anderson, SC 29625. (lbak) |
| Filing 12 ***CASE MANAGEMENT TRANSFERRED to civil case manager for Judge Richard M Gergel. Any future filings must be sent to the Clerk's Office at the following address: PO Box 835 (29402), 83 Meeting Street, Charleston, SC 29401. (lbak) |
| Filing 11 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION recommending Plaintiff's action be summarily dismissed without prejudice to bring in an appropriate court. Objections to R&R due by 7/5/2023. Add an additional 3 days only if served by mail or otherwise allowed under Fed. R. Civ. P. 6 or Fed. R. Crim. P. 45. Signed by Magistrate Judge Shiva V. Hodges on 6/20/2023. (lbak) |
| Filing 8 AMENDED COMPLAINT against Fox News Corporation, Kendra Kent, Unknown Owner, filed by Darrell Allen Findley. (Attachments: #1 Envelope) (lbak) |
| Filing 7 ***DOCUMENTS MAILED 4 Text Order on Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis, #5 Proper Form Order, #6 Order, standard complaint form, one Summons and one Form USM-285 placed in U.S. Mail from Columbia Clerks Office to Darrell Allen Findley, 2023000858, Anderson County Detention Center, 1009 David Lee Coffe Place Rd., Anderson, SC 29625. (lbak) |
Filing 6
ORDER AND NOTICE Plaintiff may attempt to correct the defects in his #1 complaint by filing an amended complaint by June 14, 2023, along with any appropriate service documents. Plaintiff is reminded an amended complaint replaces the original complaint and should be complete in itself. If Plaintiff fails to file an amended complaint or fails to cure the deficiencies identified above, the undersigned will recommend to the district court that the claims specified above be dismissed without leave for further amendment. (Specific Document due by 6/14/2023.) Signed by Magistrate Judge Shiva V. Hodges on 5/24/2023. (lbak)
|
|
Filing 5
PROPER FORM ORDER Case to be brought into proper form by 6/14/2023. Add an additional 3 days only if served by mail or otherwise allowed under Fed. R. Civ. P. 6. Signed by Magistrate Judge Shiva V. Hodges on 5/24/2023. (lbak)
|
|
Filing 4
TEXT ORDER granting #2 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. Signed by Magistrate Judge Shiva V. Hodges on 5/24/2023. (lbak)
|
| Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis (Restricted Access) by Darrell Allen Findley. Response to Motion due by 5/22/2023. Add an additional 3 days only if served by mail or otherwise allowed under Fed. R. Civ. P. 6 or Fed. R. Crim. P. 45. (Attachments: #1 Financial Certificate, #2 Account Summary, #3 Envelope) Motions referred to Shiva V. Hodges. (lbak) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Fox News Channel, filed by Darrell Allen Findley. (Attachments: #1 Envelope) (lbak) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the South Carolina District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
