Fishburne v. SC Department of Corrections et al
| Ricardo Fishburne |
| SC Department of Corrections, Lt. Banks, LT. Ward, Capt. Cleave, Lt. Jones, Ofc. Jackson, Classification Jackson, Director Bryan Stirling, Regional Director W. Davis, Warden Nelson, Central Classification and Gilliam Psych Hospital |
| 8:2023cv05469 |
| October 27, 2023 |
| US District Court for the District of South Carolina |
| Jacquelyn D Austin |
| Timothy M Cain |
| Prison:Prison Condition |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights, State Filers |
| Both |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on October 27, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 3 Local Rule 26.01 Answers to Interrogatories by Capt. Cleave, Central Classification, Classification Jackson, Gilliam Psych Hospital, LT. Ward, Lt. Banks, Lt. Jones, Ofc. Jackson, Regional Director W. Davis, SC Department of Corrections, Bryan Stirling, Warden Nelson.(rweb, ) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Richland County Court of Common Pleas, case number 2023-CP-40-4790. (Filing fee $ 402 receipt number ASCDC-11398779), filed by Capt. Cleave, Regional Director W. Davis, SC Department of Corrections, Lt. Jones, Classification Jackson, Warden Nelson, Gilliam Psych Hospital, Ofc. Jackson, Lt. Banks, Bryan Stirling, Central Classification, LT. Ward. (Attachments: #1 State Court Documents)(rweb, ) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the South Carolina District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
