Rowland v. Anderson County Sheriff's Department et al
| Tiffany Cheyenne Rowland |
| Anderson County Sheriff's Department, Chad McBride, Timothy McCarley and Anderson County Sheriff's Office |
| 8:2024cv00463 |
| January 30, 2024 |
| US District Court for the District of South Carolina |
| Jacquelyn D Austin |
| Timothy M Cain |
| Kevin McDonald |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 pr (Other) |
| Both |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 15, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 18
CONSENT AMENDED SCHEDULING ORDER: 26(a) Initial Disclosures due by 3/21/2024, Rule 26 Report due by 3/21/2024, Motions to Amend Pleadings due by 7/10/2024, Plaintiffs ID of Expert Witness due by 8/12/2024, Defendants ID of Expert Witnesses Due by 10/11/2024, Records Custodian Affidavit due by 10/11/2024, Discovery due by 11/12/2024, Mediation Due by 12/2/2024, Motions due by 12/16/2024, other deadlines as set forth. Signed by Magistrate Judge Kevin McDonald on 3/15/24. (pbri, )
|
| Filing 17 Joint Local Rule 26.03 Answers to Interrogatories by Tiffany Cheyenne Rowland.(Kendrick, Joshua) |
| Filing 16 Joint Rule 26 Outline of Discovery Plan by Tiffany Cheyenne Rowland.(Kendrick, Joshua) |
| Filing 15 Joint Rule 26(f) Report by Tiffany Cheyenne Rowland. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order Proposed Amended Scheduling Order)(Kendrick, Joshua) |
| Filing 14 AMENDED ANSWER to #1 Notice of Removal, by Anderson County Sheriff's Office, Chad McBride, Timothy McCarley. (McDade, James) |
| Filing 13 NOTICE OF CHANGE OF CASE NUMBER: The new case number is 8:24-cv-00463-JDA-KFM. Please make a note of this for all future filings as well as Judges' filing preferences. (jens) |
| Filing 12 Case Reassigned to Judge Honorable Jacquelyn D Austin. Judge Honorable Timothy M Cain no longer assigned to the case. (cwil, ) |
|
Filing 11
SCHEDULING ORDER: Rule 26(f) Conference Deadline 3/7/2024, 26(a) Initial Disclosures due by 3/21/2024, Rule 26 Report due by 3/21/2024, Motions to Amend Pleadings due by 4/11/2024, Plaintiffs ID of Expert Witness due by 5/13/2024, Defendants ID of Expert Witnesses Due by 6/12/2024, Records Custodian Affidavit due by 6/12/2024, Discovery due by 8/12/2024, Mediation Due by 8/26/2024, Motions due by 9/16/2024, other deadlines as set out. Signed by Magistrate Judge Kevin McDonald on 2/15/24. (pbri, )
|
| Filing 10 Local Rule 26.01 Answers to Interrogatories by Tiffany Cheyenne Rowland.(Kendrick, Joshua) |
| Filing 9 ANSWER to Complaint by Anderson County Sheriff's Office, Chad McBride, Timothy McCarley.(McDade, James) |
| Filing 4 CLERK'S NOTICE Plaintiff is directed to file their Local Rule 26.01 Answers to Interrogatories (including section H) no later than 2/13/24. (rweb, ) Modified on 2/1/2024: to add text (section H) (kmca). |
| Filing 2 Local Rule 26.01 Answers to Interrogatories by Anderson County Sheriff's Department, Chad McBride, Timothy McCarley.(rweb, ) (Main Document 2 replaced on 2/1/2024: to replace with corrected document (Question H) as provided by filing user) (kmca). |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Anderson County Court of Common Pleas, case number 2023-CP-40-2441. (Filing fee $ 405 receipt number ASCDC-11558532), filed by Chad McBride, Timothy McCarley, Anderson County Sheriff's Department. (Attachments: #1 State Court Documents, #2 State Court Notice of Removal)(rweb, ) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the South Carolina District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
