Sarratt v. Stirling et al
| Lorretta Shuggar Paris, Goddess Shuggar Sarratt, Michael Anthony Sarratt and Michael A Sarratt |
| FNU Stonebreaker, Officer FNU Keith, Officer FNU Ramp, FNU James, Sgt Shawanda Washington, Netra Adams, Kenneth L James, Officer FNU Delk, FNU Ray, FNU McDuffy, FNU Smith, William Langdon, South Carolina Department of Corrections, FNU Hubbard, Bryan P Stirling and Yvonne Wilkens-Smith |
| 8:2024cv05909 |
| October 16, 2024 |
| U.S. District Court for the District of South Carolina |
| William S Brown |
| Donald C Coggins |
| Prison:Prison Condition |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights, State Filers |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on November 20, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 12 OBJECTION to #10 Report and Recommendation by Michael Anthony Sarratt. Reply to Objections due by 12/4/2024. Add an additional 3 days only if served by mail or otherwise allowed under Fed. R. Civ. P. 6. (Attachments: #1 Cover Letter, #2 Supporting Documents, #3 Certificate of Service, #4 Envelope)(rweb, ) |
| Filing 11 ***DOCUMENT MAILED #10 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION placed in U.S. Mail from Greenville Clerks Office to Michael Anthony Sarratt, 299026, Evans Correctional Institution, 610 Highway 9 W, Bennettsville, SC 29512. (rweb, ) |
| Filing 10 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION. It is recommended that Plaintiff's motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis (ECF No. #2 ) be DENIED. It is further recommended that Plaintiff be given twenty-one (21) days from the date the United States District Judge rules on this Report and Recommendation to pay the filing fee of four hundred and five dollars ($405). If Plaintiff fails to pay the filing fee within the specified time period, it is further recommended that the Complaint be dismissed without prejudice. Objections to R&R due by 11/20/2024. Add an additional 3 days only if served by mail or otherwise allowed under Fed. R. Civ. P. 6 or Fed. R. Crim. P. 45. Signed by Magistrate Judge William S. Brown on 11/6/24. (rweb, ) |
| Filing 7 ***DOCUMENT MAILED #6 Proper Form Order, financial certificate, summons and (16) USM-285 forms placed in U.S. Mail from Greenville Clerks Office to Michael Anthony Sarratt, 299026, Evans Correctional Institution, 610 Highway 9 W, Bennettsville, SC 29512. (rweb, ) |
Filing 6
PROPER FORM ORDER Case to be brought into proper form by 11/12/2024. Add an additional 3 days only if served by mail or otherwise allowed under Fed. R. Civ. P. 6. Signed by Magistrate Judge William S. Brown on 10/21/24. (rweb, )
|
| Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis (Restricted Access) by Michael Anthony Sarratt. Response to Motion due by 10/30/2024. Add an additional 3 days only if served by mail or otherwise allowed under Fed. R. Civ. P. 6 or Fed. R. Crim. P. 45. No proposed order.Motions referred to William S. Brown.(pbri, ) (Additional attachment(s) added on 10/24/2024: #1 Cover Letter, #2 Financial Certificate, #3 Envelope) (rweb, ). (Additional attachment(s) added on 11/5/2024: #4 2nd Financial Certificate, #5 Envelope) (rweb, ). |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Netra Adams, FNU Delk, FNU Hubbard, FNU James, Kenneth L James, FNU Keith, William Langdon, FNU McDuffy, FNU Ramp, FNU Ray, FNU Smith, South Carolina Department of Corrections, Bryan P Stirling, FNU Stonebreaker, Shawanda Washington, Yvonne Wilkens-Smith, filed by Michael Anthony Sarratt. Service due by 1/14/2025. (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(pbri, ) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the South Carolina District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
