Lucas v. Ozmint et al
Plaintiff: Martin Walter Lucas
Defendant: John Ozmint, John Doe, Jane Doe, Timothy Riley and Ms Merchant
Case Number: 9:2010cv00017
Filed: January 5, 2010
Court: US District Court for the District of South Carolina
Office: Beaufort Office
County: Richland
Presiding Judge: Cameron McGowan Currie
Presiding Judge: Bristow Marchant
Nature of Suit: Prison:Prison Condition
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights, State Filers
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
April 2, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 72 ORDER denying 64 Motion for Reconsideration re 60 Order on Motion to Certify Class, Order on Motion to Appoint Counsel, Order on Motion for Summary Judgment, Order on Report and Recommendations. Signed by Honorable Cameron McGowan Currie on 4/2/12.(hhil, )
January 10, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 60 ORDER adopting Report and Recommendations of Magistrate Judge Bristow Marchant; denying 41 Motion to Certify Class; denying 41 Motion to Appoint Counsel ; granting 42 Motion for Summary Judgment and dismissing this matter with prejudice. Signed by Honorable Cameron McGowan Currie on 1/10/2012.(cwhi, )
March 22, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 37 OPINION AND ORDER denying 23 Motion for Summary Judgment. This denial is without prejudice to Defendants' right to file an additional properly-supported dispositive motion. Should Defendant seek to file an additional d ispositive motion, it should be filed by Friday, April 29, 2011. Plaintiff will then be accorded an opportunity to respond to Defendants' summary judgment motion in a manner consistent with the Rules. This matter is returned to the Magistrate Judge for further pretrial proceedings. Signed by Honorable Cameron McGowan Currie on 3/22/11.(rpol, )
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the South Carolina District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Lucas v. Ozmint et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Martin Walter Lucas
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: John Ozmint
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: John Doe
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Jane Doe
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Timothy Riley
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Ms Merchant
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?