Rivers v. Vera
Plaintiff: Brenda Denise Rivers
Defendant: Yolanda Vera
Case Number: 9:2010cv01654
Filed: June 25, 2010
Court: US District Court for the District of South Carolina
Office: Beaufort Office
County: Jasper
Presiding Judge: Bristow Marchant
Presiding Judge: Margaret B Seymour
Nature of Suit: Employment
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 2000
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
March 6, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 59 ORDER adopting Report and Recommendations re 52 Report and Recommendations.; denying 34 Plaintiff's Motion for Summary Judgment; granting 37 Defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment ; 54 Plaintiff's objections are overruled and this matter is ended. Signed by Honorable Sol Blatt, Jr on 3/5/2012.(vdru, )
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the South Carolina District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Rivers v. Vera
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Brenda Denise Rivers
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Yolanda Vera
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?