Smith v. Teledyne Continental Motors Inc
Plaintiff: Edward I Smith
Defendant: Teledyne Continental Motors Inc
Case Number: 9:2010cv02152
Filed: August 18, 2010
Court: US District Court for the District of South Carolina
Office: Beaufort Office
County: Beaufort
Presiding Judge: Sol Blatt
Nature of Suit: Property Damage Product Liability
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
January 30, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 321 ORDER denying (294) Motion for Partial Summary Judgment in case 9:10-cv-02152-WOB; denying (329) Motion for Partial Summary Judgment in case 9:10-cv-02546-WOB. Signed by Honorable William O Bertelsman on 1/30/2013.Associated Cases: 9:10-cv-02152-WOB, 9:10-cv-02546-WOB(ahat, )
December 4, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 299 ORDER granting (291) Motion to Dismiss in case 9:10-cv-02152-WOB; granting (322) Motion to Dismiss in case 9:10-cv-02546-WOB. Details set forth in Order. Signed by Honorable William O Bertelsman on 12/04/2012.Associated Cases: 9:10-cv-02152-WOB, 9:10-cv-02546-WOB(ahat, )
August 9, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 247 ORDER granting (237) Motion to Dismiss Hartzell in case 9:10-cv-02152-WOB; granting (264) Motion to Dismiss Hartzell in case 9:10-cv-02546-WOB. Plaintiff's claims against Hartzell are dismissed with prejudice. Further, Plaintiff and Hartzell are to bear their own costs incurred. Signed by Honorable William O Bertelsman on 08/09/2012.Associated Cases: 9:10-cv-02152-WOB, 9:10-cv-02546-WOB(alan, )
January 3, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 171 IT IS ORDERED that Teledyne's motions to dismiss (15)(60) be, and are hereby, DENIED in case 9:10-cv-02152-WOB -BHH. In case 9:10-cv-02546-WOB -BHH, the (81) Motion to Dismiss is denied. The parties shall adhere to the discovery deadline previously set by the Court. Signed by Honorable William O Bertelsman on 1/3/12. Associated Cases: 9:10-cv-02152-WOB -BHH, 9:10-cv-02546-WOB -BHH(cper, )
December 13, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 168 ORDER granting (156) Motion to Dismiss Lancair (173 Motion to Dismiss in case 9:10-cv-02546-WOB -BHH). Further, Lancair's Motions to Dismiss are withdrawn from this Court's attention (withdrawing (59) Motion to Dismi ss; withdrawing (147) Motion to Dismiss and in case 9:10-cv-02546 withdrawing (80) Motion to Dismiss; withdrawing (163) Motion to Dismiss. Details set forth in Order. Signed by Honorable William O Bertelsman on 12/13/2011.Associated Cases: 9:10-cv-02152-WOB -BHH, 9:10-cv-02546-WOB -BHH(alan, )
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the South Carolina District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Smith v. Teledyne Continental Motors Inc
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Teledyne Continental Motors Inc
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Edward I Smith
Represented By: Samuel Kimeron Allen
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?