Morris v. Stevenson
Petitioner: James William Morris, Jr
Respondent: Robert M Stevenson, III
Case Number: 9:2010cv02299
Filed: September 2, 2010
Court: US District Court for the District of South Carolina
Office: Beaufort Office
County: Richland
Presiding Judge: Bristow Marchant
Presiding Judge: Joseph F Anderson
Nature of Suit: General
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
June 8, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 32 ORDER ADOPTING 28 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS of Magistrate Judge Bristow Marchant. Respondent's motion for summary judgment 19 is granted andthe habeas petition is denied. A certificate of appealability is denied. Signed by Honorable Joseph F Anderson, Jr on 6/8/11.(rpol, )
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the South Carolina District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Morris v. Stevenson
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: James William Morris, Jr
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: Robert M Stevenson, III
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?