Freeman v. Pate
Petitioner: Fred Freeman
Respondent: John R Pate
Case Number: 9:2011cv01421
Filed: June 10, 2011
Court: US District Court for the District of South Carolina
Office: Beaufort Office
County: Allendale
Presiding Judge: Bristow Marchant
Presiding Judge: David C Norton
Nature of Suit: General
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
August 8, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 16 JUDGMENT : This petition is dismissed without prejudice and without issuance and service of process. The petitioner shall take nothing on his petition filed pursuant to Title 28 U.S.C. § 2254. (hhil, )
August 3, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 15 ORDER affirming 11 Report and Recommendations. Signed by Chief Judge David C Norton on 8/3/2011.(eric, )
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the South Carolina District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Freeman v. Pate
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: John R Pate
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: Fred Freeman
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?