Allen v. Mackie
Petitioner: Comest Sabatino Allen
Respondent: Warden McKie
Case Number: 9:2012cv02583
Filed: September 7, 2012
Court: US District Court for the District of South Carolina
Office: Beaufort Office
County: Greenville
Presiding Judge: Timothy M Cain
Presiding Judge: Bristow Marchant
Nature of Suit: General
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
November 15, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 15 ORDER adopting Report and Recommendations of Magistrate Judge Bristow Marchant. It is therefore ORDERED that the Petition is DISMISSED without prejudice and without requiring Respondent to file an Answer or return. Signed by Honorable Timothy M Cain on 11/14/2012.(cwhi, )
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the South Carolina District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Allen v. Mackie
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: Warden McKie
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: Comest Sabatino Allen
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?