Simon v. Paige et al
Jovan Cornelius Simon |
Kevin Paige, Bucky Geddings, Mark Jennings and H Eric Cohoon |
9:2013cv03025 |
November 6, 2013 |
US District Court for the District of South Carolina |
Beaufort Office |
Dillon |
Richard M Gergel |
Bristow Marchant |
Civil Rights |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
None |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 100 ORDER adopting Report and Recommendations of Magistrate Judge Bristow Marchant; granting 84 Motion for Summary Judgment; granting 90 Motion to Dismiss. This case is dismissed. Signed by Honorable Richard M Gergel on 3/13/2015.(cwhi, ) |
Filing 70 ORDER adopting Report and Recommendations of Magistrate Judge Bristow Marchant; granting 47 Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings and the state law tort claim asserted against Defendant in his individual capacity is DISMISSED. Signed by Honorable Richard M Gergel on 7/3/2014.(cwhi, ) |
Filing 64 ORDER adopting Report and Recommendations of Magistrate Judge Bristow Marchant. Accordingly, Cohoon's Motion to Dismiss, (Dkt. No. 42), is DENIED. Signed by Honorable Richard M Gergel on 6/27/2014.(cwhi, ) |
Filing 39 ORDER RULING ON REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION for 27 Motion to Dismiss filed by Kevin Paige, 33 Report and Recommendation. The Court adopts the Report and Recommendation. Accordingly, Defendant Paige's Motion to Dismiss (Dkt. No. 27) is DENIED. Signed by Honorable Richard M Gergel on 5/2/2014. (jbry, ) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the South Carolina District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.