Al-Mujahidin v. Harouff et al
| Muhammad Al-Mujahidin |
| Daniel Harouff, Daniel Bush, D Arrowood, Cathy Jones, Michael McCall and SCDC |
| 9:2014cv01266 |
| April 8, 2014 |
| US District Court for the District of South Carolina |
| Beaufort Office |
| McCormick |
| Mary G Lewis |
| Bristow Marchant |
| Prison Condition |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
75
OPINION AND ORDER adopting in part 66 Report and Recommendation; granting in part and denying in part 51 Motion for Summary Judgment. The Court adopts the Report with the exception of the portion relating to the plainti ff's claims regarding the defendants' alleged refusal to allow him to decontaminate. The defendants' motion for summary judgment is GRANTED with regard to the plaintiff's claim for excessive force in connection with the May 26 cell extraction, the plaintiff's claim regarding the use of the restraint chair, and the plaintiff's claim for deliberate indifference to serious medical needs, and DENIED with regard to the plaintiff's claim for excessive force in connection with the June 20 shower extraction and the Eighth Amendment claim arising from the defendants' alleged refusal to allow him to decontaminate. The defendants Cathy Jones and SCDC in its official capacity are dismissed from this action. The case remains pending against the defendants Daniel Harouff, Daniel Bush, D. Arrowood, and Michael McCall. Signed by Honorable Bruce Howe Hendricks on 9/2/2015.(ssam, )
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the South Carolina District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
