Washington v. Cartledge et al
Petitioner: William Washington
Respondent: Leroy Cartledge
Case Number: 9:2014cv02244
Filed: June 10, 2014
Court: US District Court for the District of South Carolina
Office: Beaufort Office
County: McCormick
Presiding Judge: Mary G Lewis
Nature of Suit: General
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 2241
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
July 10, 2017 Opinion or Order Filing 44 ORDER adopting 9 Report and Recommendation of Magistrate Judge Bristow Marchant. It is the judgment of the Court the petition is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE and without requiring Respondent to file a return. To the extent Petitioner requests a certificate of appealability from this Court, that Certificate is DENIED. Signed by Honorable Mary Geiger Lewis on 7/10/2017.(ssam, )
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the South Carolina District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Washington v. Cartledge et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: William Washington
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: Leroy Cartledge
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?