Brooks v. Hill Finklea Detention Center et al
| Altony Brooks |
| Officer Fludd, John Doe, Lieutenant Johnson, Hill Finklea Detention Center and Captain Jackelman |
| 9:2015cv02677 |
| July 7, 2015 |
| US District Court for the District of South Carolina |
| Beaufort Office |
| Lee |
| Prison Condition |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on August 3, 2017. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 224
ORDER adopting 204 Report and Recommendation; granting 176 Motion for Summary Judgment; denying 198 Motion for Summary Judgment; denying 203 Motion for Contempt; denying 218 Motion for Extension of Time to File Res ponse/Reply re 204 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION re 176 MOTION for Summary Judgment filed by Berkeley County Sheriff's Office, Officer Fludd, Captain Jackelman. Signed by Honorable Patrick Michael Duffy on 08/03/2017. (egra, )
|
|
Filing 119
ORDER denying 116 Motion for Reconsideration. Signed by Honorable Patrick Michael Duffy on 4/21/2016.(adeh, )
|
|
Filing 110
ORDER adopting Report and Recommendations re 97 Report and Recommendation.; granting in part and denying in part 26 Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim. Signed by Honorable Patrick Michael Duffy on 3/23/2016.(adeh, )
|
|
Filing 103
ORDER adopting Report and Recommendations re 17 Report and Recommendation. Signed by Honorable Patrick Michael Duffy on 3/1/16.(adeh, )
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the South Carolina District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
