Bell v. United States
Plaintiff: Monica V Bell
Defendant: United States
Case Number: 9:2016cv01225
Filed: April 20, 2016
Court: US District Court for the District of South Carolina
Office: Beaufort Office
County: XUS, Outside State
Presiding Judge: Richard M Gergel
Nature of Suit: Other Personal Injury
Cause of Action: 28:1346
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
May 19, 2017 Opinion or Order Filing 30 ORDER AND OPINION granting 28 Defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment as to Plaintiffs first cause of action for negligence and DISMISSES WITHOUT PREJUDICE Plaintiffs second cause of action for violation of the RehabilitationAct of 1973. AND IT IS SO ORDERED. Signed by Honorable Richard M Gergel on 5/19/2017.(sshe, )
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the South Carolina District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Bell v. United States
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Monica V Bell
Represented By: Patrick W Carr
Represented By: Allison Claire Diercks
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: United States
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?