United States v. Liberty Mutual Insurance Company et al
| United States |
| Carothers Construction Inc and Liberty Mutual Insurance Company |
| 9:2018cv02534 |
| September 13, 2018 |
| US District Court for the District of South Carolina |
| Bruce Howe Hendricks |
| Miller Act |
| 40 U.S.C. ยง 3131 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on November 5, 2018. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 15 TEXT ORDER granting #8 Motion to Stay and staying this case in full pending the parties' arbitration. The Court declines to address any issue regarding the locale for the arbitration hearing. IT IS SO ORDERED. Entered at the Direction of The Honorable Bruce Howe Hendricks on 11/5/2018.(vdru, ) |
| Filing 14 RESPONSE to Motion re #8 MOTION to Stay Under the Federal Arbitration Act Response filed by United States.Reply to Response to Motion due by 10/26/2018 Add an additional 3 days only if served by mail or otherwise allowed under Fed. R. Civ. P. 6. (Sutcliffe, Lindsay) |
| Filing 13 Plaintiff E&D Coatings, Inc.'s ANSWER to Counterclaim #7 by United States.(Sutcliffe, Lindsay) |
| Filing 12 SUMMONS Returned Executed by United States. Liberty Mutual Insurance Company served on 9/20/2018, answer due 10/11/2018. (Attachments: #1 Affidavit of Service on Def Liberty Mutual)(Sutcliffe, Lindsay) |
| Filing 11 Local Rule 26.01 Answers to Interrogatories by Liberty Mutual Insurance Company.(Butler, Drew) |
| Filing 10 ANSWER to #1 Complaint by Liberty Mutual Insurance Company.(Butler, Drew) |
| Filing 9 SUMMONS Returned Executed by United States. Carothers Construction Inc served on 9/18/2018, answer due 10/9/2018. (Sutcliffe, Lindsay) (Main Document 9 replaced on 10/12/2018) (alew, ). (Additional attachment(s) added on 10/12/2018: #1 Affidavit of Service fas to Carother's Construction Inc c/o Registered Agent) (alew, ). Modified on 10/12/2018 to add corrected document provided by filing user (alew, ). |
| Filing 8 MOTION to Stay Under the Federal Arbitration Act by Carothers Construction Inc. Response to Motion due by 10/19/2018. Add an additional 3 days only if served by mail or otherwise allowed under Fed. R. Civ. P. 6 or Fed. R. Crim. P. 45. (Attachments: #1 Memo in Support, #2 Exhibit Subcontract, #3 Exhibit Demand for Arbitration, #4 Exhibit E&D Answering Statement, #5 Exhibit Objection to Locale, #6 Exhibit Affidavit of Ben Logan, #7 Exhibit 2018.09.24 Email from AAA regarding rule on locale issue, #8 Exhibit AAA Rule 12B, #9 Exhibit SC Code 15-7-120, #10 Exhibit MCAS Beaufort information)No proposed order.(Beaver, Ryan) |
| Filing 7 Carothers Construction, Inc.'s ANSWER to #1 Complaint , COUNTERCLAIM against All Plaintiffs by Carothers Construction Inc. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Subcontract)(Beaver, Ryan) |
| Filing 6 Summons Issued as to Carothers Construction Inc. c/o Registered Agent Solutions, Inc., 1245 Plunkett Road Gulfport, MS 39503. (alew, ) |
| Filing 4 Summons Issued as to Carothers Construction Inc, Liberty Mutual Insurance Company. (Attachments: #1 Summons - Carothers Construction Inc)(alew, ) |
| Filing 3 Local Rule 26.01 Answers to Interrogatories by United States.(alew, ) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Carothers Construction Inc, Liberty Mutual Insurance Company ( Filing fee $ 400 receipt number 0420-7998291.), filed by United States. Service due by 12/12/2018(alew, ) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the South Carolina District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
