Beaufort Regional Chamber of Commerce v. City of Beaufort
Plaintiff: Beaufort Regional Chamber of Commerce
Defendant: City of Beaufort
Case Number: 9:2018cv02565
Filed: September 18, 2018
Court: US District Court for the District of South Carolina
Presiding Judge: Richard M Gergel
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights: Other
Cause of Action: 15 U.S.C. ยง 1051
Jury Demanded By: Both
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on May 16, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
November 16, 2018 Filing 21 Local Rule 26.03 Answers to Interrogatories by City of Beaufort.(Drazan, Thomas)
November 16, 2018 Filing 20 Rule 26(f) Report by City of Beaufort. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Exhibit A - Mediation of Cases Pending Before Judge Gergel, #2 Exhibit Exhibit B - Answers to Rule 26(a)(1) Initial Disclosures)(Drazan, Thomas)
November 16, 2018 Filing 19 Local Rule 26.03 Answers to Interrogatories by Beaufort Regional Chamber of Commerce.(Twombley, J)
November 16, 2018 Filing 18 Rule 26(f) Report by Beaufort Regional Chamber of Commerce. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - Mediation of Cases Pending Before Judge Gergel, #2 Exhibit B - Answers to Rule 26(a)(1) Initial Disclosures)(Twombley, J)
November 9, 2018 Filing 17 MOTION to Amend/Correct #1 Complaint by Beaufort Regional Chamber of Commerce. Response to Motion due by 11/26/2018. Add an additional 3 days only if served by mail or otherwise allowed under Fed. R. Civ. P. 6 or Fed. R. Crim. P. 45. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1 - proposed Amended Complaint)No proposed order.(Twombley, J)
November 2, 2018 Filing 16 SUPPLEMENT by City of Beaufort to #15 Reply to Response to Motion . (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Amended Reply to Plaintiff's Response to Defendant's Motion to Dismiss)(Anderson, Jonathan) Modified on 11/5/2018 to edit docket text for clarification as to reply to response (sshe, ).
October 31, 2018 Filing 15 REPLY to Response to Motion re #7 First MOTION to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction First MOTION TO DISMISS FOR FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM Response filed by City of Beaufort. (Anderson, Jonathan) Modified on 11/6/2018 to reference #16 Supplement filed 11/2/18(sshe, ).
October 26, 2018 Filing 14 NOTICE of Appearance by William B Harvey, III on behalf of City of Beaufort (Harvey, William)
October 24, 2018 Filing 13 RESPONSE in Opposition re #7 First MOTION to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction First MOTION TO DISMISS FOR FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM Response filed by Beaufort Regional Chamber of Commerce.Reply to Response to Motion due by 10/31/2018 Add an additional 3 days only if served by mail or otherwise allowed under Fed. R. Civ. P. 6. (Twombley, J)
October 12, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 12 SCHEDULING ORDER Rule 26(f) Conference Deadline 11/2/2018, 26(a) Initial Disclosures due by 11/16/2018, Rule 26 Report due by 11/16/2018, Motions to Amend Pleadings due by 1/10/2019, Plaintiffs ID of Expert Witness due by 2/11/2019, Defendants ID of Expert Witnesses Due by 3/11/2019, Records Custodian Affidavit due by 3/18/2019, Discovery due by 4/10/2019, Motion in Limine due by 15 business days prior to jury selection, Motions due by 4/24/2019, Rule 26(a)(3) Disclosures due by 21 business days prior to jury selection, Pretrial Briefs due by 5 business days prior to jury selection, Case ready for Jury Selection and/or Trial Deadline on or after 8/5/2019 Signed by Honorable Richard M Gergel on 10/12/2018. (sshe, )
October 11, 2018 Filing 10 NOTICE of Appearance by Thomas Francis Drazan on behalf of City of Beaufort (Drazan, Thomas)
October 10, 2018 Filing 9 Local Rule 26.01 Answers to Interrogatories by City of Beaufort.(Anderson, Jonathan)
October 10, 2018 Filing 8 ANSWER to #1 Complaint by City of Beaufort.(Anderson, Jonathan)
October 10, 2018 Filing 7 First MOTION to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction , First MOTION TO DISMISS FOR FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM ( Response to Motion due by 10/24/2018. Add an additional 3 days only if served by mail or otherwise allowed under Fed. R. Civ. P. 6 or Fed. R. Crim. P. 45. ) by City of Beaufort. No proposed order.(Anderson, Jonathan)
October 10, 2018 Filing 6 ACCEPTANCE OF SERVICE OF COMPLAINT by Beaufort Regional Chamber of Commerce. All Defendants. (Twombley, J)
September 19, 2018 Filing 5 Report on the Filing or Determination of an Action or Appeal Regarding a Patent or Trademark. (sshe, )
September 18, 2018 Filing 3 Summons Issued as to City of Beaufort. (sshe, )
September 18, 2018 Filing 2 Local Rule 26.01 Answers to Interrogatories by Beaufort Regional Chamber of Commerce.(sshe, )
September 18, 2018 Filing 1 COMPLAINT against City of Beaufort ( Filing fee $ 400 receipt number 0420-8005952.), filed by Beaufort Regional Chamber of Commerce. Service due by 12/17/2018(sshe, )

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the South Carolina District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Beaufort Regional Chamber of Commerce v. City of Beaufort
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Beaufort Regional Chamber of Commerce
Represented By: J Ashley Twombley
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: City of Beaufort
Represented By: Thomas Francis Drazan
Represented By: William B Harvey, III
Represented By: Jonathan J Anderson
Represented By: Lisa A Reynolds
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?