Singleton v. State of South Carolina
Petitioner: Arthur Singleton
Respondent: State of South Carolina and Warden of Lee Correctional Institution
Case Number: 9:2018cv03300
Filed: December 7, 2018
Court: US District Court for the District of South Carolina
Presiding Judge: R Bryan Harwell
Referring Judge: Bristow Marchant
Nature of Suit: Habeas Corpus (General)
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on February 13, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
January 11, 2019 Filing 13 ACKNOWLEDGMENT OF SERVICE Executed Acknowledgment filed by Warden of Lee Correctional Institution. (Attachments: #1 Certificate of Service)(Brown, Melody)
January 10, 2019 Filing 12 ***DOCUMENT MAILED #10 Order 2254, #11 Order on Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis placed in U.S. Mail to Arthur Singleton 300109 F/4 Lee Correctional Institute 990 Wisacky Highway Bishopville, SC 29010. (egra, )
January 10, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 11 REFERENCE #10 ORDER granting #8 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. Signed by Magistrate Judge Bristow Marchant on 01/10/2019. (egra, )
January 10, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 10 ORDER authorizing service of process. Directing petitioner to notify the clerk in writing of any change of address. Return and Memorandum due by 3/1/2019. Signed by Magistrate Judge Bristow Marchant on 01/10/2019. (egra, )
January 2, 2019 Filing 8 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis (Restricted Access) by Arthur Singleton. Response to Motion due by 1/16/2019. Add an additional 3 days only if served by mail or otherwise allowed under Fed. R. Civ. P. 6 or Fed. R. Crim. P. 45. (Attachments: #1 Envelope) Motions referred to Bristow Marchant. (hada, )
December 12, 2018 Filing 6 ***DOCUMENT MAILED #5 Proper Form Order, and required documents placed in U.S. Mail to Arthur Singleton 300109 F/4 Lee Correctional Institute 990 Wisacky Highway Bishopville, SC 29010. (egra, )
December 12, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 5 PROPER FORM ORDER Case to be brought into proper form by 1/2/2019. Add an additional 3 days only if served by mail or otherwise allowed under Fed. R. Civ. P. 6. Signed by Magistrate Judge Bristow Marchant on 12/12/2018. (egra, )
December 7, 2018 Filing 1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus, filed by Arthur Singleton. (Attachments: #1 Supporting Documents, #2 Cover Letter, #3 Envelope) (hada, )

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the South Carolina District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Singleton v. State of South Carolina
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: State of South Carolina
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: Warden of Lee Correctional Institution
Represented By: Melody Jane Brown
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: Arthur Singleton
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?