Lockwood v. Town of Bluffton
Mary Lockwood |
Town of Bluffton |
9:2019cv00256 |
January 29, 2019 |
US District Court for the District of South Carolina |
Mary Gordon Baker |
Margaret B Seymour |
Civil Rights: Jobs |
42 U.S.C. ยง 2000 e |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on March 5, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 10 TEXT ORDER re #8 Notice of Request for Protection from Court Appearance. The undersigned grants protection to Attorney Mary Bass Lohr for the following time periods: Mary 20-28, 2019; June 10-13, 2019; and July 1-8, 2019. This Order does not afford protection from any appearance required before the District Court Judge assigned to this case, although she may separately grant such protection. Entered at the direction of Magistrate Judge Mary Gordon Baker on 3/5/19. (akob, ) |
Filing 9 TEXT ORDER re #7 Notice of Request for Protection from Court Appearance. The undersigned grants protection to Attorney Donald Gist for the following time periods: March 27-April 3, 2019 and April 12-19, 2019. This Order does not afford protection from any appearance required before the District Court Judge assigned to this case, although she may separately grant such protection. Entered at the direction of Magistrate Judge Mary Gordon Baker on 3/5/19. (akob, ) |
Filing 8 NOTICE of Request for Protection from Court Appearance by Mary Bass Lohr for 5/20/19-5/28/19, 6/10/19-6/13/19, 7/1/19-7/8/19 (Lohr, Mary) |
Filing 7 NOTICE of Request for Protection from Court Appearance by Donald Gist for March 27, 2019-April 3, 2019 and April 12, 2019-April 19, 2019 (Gist, Donald) |
Filing 6 CONFERENCE AND SCHEDULING ORDER Rule 26(f) Conference Deadline 3/18/2019, 26(a) Initial Disclosures due by 4/1/2019, Rule 26 Report due by 4/1/2019, Motions to Amend Pleadings due by 4/22/2019, Plaintiffs ID of Expert Witness due by 5/22/2019, Defendants ID of Expert Witnesses Due by 6/21/2019, Records Custodian Affidavit due by 6/21/2019, Discovery due by 8/20/2019, Motions due by 10/21/2019, Mediation Due by 9/19/2019. Signed by Magistrate Judge Mary Gordon Baker on 02/25/2019. (hada, ) |
Filing 5 ANSWER to #1 Complaint by Town of Bluffton.(Lohr, Mary) |
Filing 4 Summons Issued as to Town of Bluffton. (hada, ) |
Filing 3 Local Rule 26.01 Answers to Interrogatories by Mary Lockwood.(hada, ) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Town of Bluffton ( Filing fee $ 400 receipt number 0420-8239180.), filed by Mary Lockwood. Service due by 4/29/2019. (hada, ) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the South Carolina District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Lockwood v. Town of Bluffton | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: Town of Bluffton | |
Represented By: | Mary Bass Lohr |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: Mary Lockwood | |
Represented By: | Aaron Vernon Wallace |
Represented By: | Donald Gist |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.