Epstein v. Town of Bluffton
| Sheldon A. Epstein |
| Town of Bluffton |
| 9:2019cv02251 |
| August 11, 2019 |
| US District Court for the District of South Carolina |
| Bristow Marchant |
| David C Norton |
| Civil Rights: Jobs |
| 29 U.S.C. ยง 621 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on October 3, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 9 RESPONSE in Opposition re #8 MOTION for Protective Order Defendant's Subpoena to Plaintiff's Current Employer MOTION to Quash Defendant's Subpoena to Plaintiff's Current Employer Response filed by Town of Bluffton.Reply to Response to Motion due by 10/10/2019 Add an additional 3 days only if served by mail or otherwise allowed under Fed. R. Civ. P. 6. (Lohr, Mary) |
| Filing 8 MOTION for Protective Order Defendant's Subpoena to Plaintiff's Current Employer, MOTION to Quash Defendant's Subpoena to Plaintiff's Current Employer ( Response to Motion due by 10/3/2019. Add an additional 3 days only if served by mail or otherwise allowed under Fed. R. Civ. P. 6 or Fed. R. Crim. P. 45. ) by Sheldon A. Epstein. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Sheldon Epstein's Declaration, #2 Exhibit Defense Counsel's letter to Mr. Epstein's current employer, #3 Exhibit Defendant's Subpoena to Mr. Epstein's Current Employer)No proposed order.Motions referred to Bristow Marchant.(Mullaney, Marybeth) |
Filing 7
CONFERENCE AND SCHEDULING ORDER Rule 26(f) Conference Deadline 9/30/2019, 26(a) Initial Disclosures due by 10/14/2019, Rule 26 Report due by 10/24/2019, Motions to Amend Pleadings due by 11/4/2019, Plaintiffs ID of Expert Witness due by 12/4/2019, Defendants ID of Expert Witnesses Due by 1/3/2020, Records Custodian Affidavit due by 1/3/2020, Discovery due by 3/3/2020, Motions due by 5/31/2020, Mediation Due by 4/3/2020. Signed by Magistrate Judge Bristow Marchant on 09/09/2019. (egra, ) (Main Document 7 replaced on 9/9/2019) (egra, ). Modified on 9/9/2019 to correct date in scheduling order as directed by chambers (egra, ).
|
| Filing 5 ANSWER to #1 Complaint by Town of Bluffton.(Lohr, Mary) |
| Filing 4 Local Rule 26.01 Answers to Interrogatories by Sheldon A. Epstein. (egra, ) |
| Filing 2 Summons Issued as to Town of Bluffton. Service due by 11/12/2019. (egra, ) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Town of Bluffton ( Filing fee $ 400 receipt number 0420-8606933.), filed by Sheldon A. Epstein. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit - Right to Sue Letter) (egra, ) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the South Carolina District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Epstein v. Town of Bluffton | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Sheldon A. Epstein | |
| Represented By: | Marybeth E Mullaney |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Town of Bluffton | |
| Represented By: | Mary Bass Lohr |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
