Kyle Rahn v. Commissioner of Social Security Administration
Plaintiff: Debra Jill Kyle Rahn
Defendant: Commissioner of Social Security Administration
Interested Party: Social Security Administrative Record
Case Number: 9:2019cv02912
Filed: October 15, 2019
Court: US District Court for the District of South Carolina
Presiding Judge: J Michelle Childs
Referring Judge: Bristow Marchant
Nature of Suit: Social Security: DIWC/DIWW
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 405
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on October 29, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
October 29, 2019 Filing 10 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Debra Jill Kyle Rahn. Commissioner of Social Security Administration served on 10/21/2019, pursuant to Local Rule 83.VII.03 answer due 2/18/2020. (Attachments: #1 Supporting Documents Certified Mail Receipts)(Clardy, Timothy)
October 28, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 9 ORDER denying as moot #4 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. Signed by Magistrate Judge Bristow Marchant on 10/28/2019.(elac, )
October 28, 2019 Filing 7 Filing fee: $ 400.00, receipt number SCX200016736 (cpeg, )
October 17, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 6 PROPER FORM ORDER Case to be brought into proper form by 11/7/2019. Add an additional 3 days only if served by mail or otherwise allowed under Fed. R. Civ. P. 6. Signed by Magistrate Judge Bristow Marchant on 10/17/2019. (Attachments: #1 Plaintiff's Answer, #2 Form AO 239)(cpeg, )
October 15, 2019 Filing 4 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis (Restricted Access) by Debra Jill Kyle Rahn. Response to Motion due by 10/30/2019. Add an additional 3 days only if served by mail or otherwise allowed under Fed. R. Civ. P. 6 or Fed. R. Crim. P. 45. No proposed order.Motions referred to Bristow Marchant.(cpeg, ) Modified on 10/16/2019 to correct filing date (cpeg, ).
October 15, 2019 Filing 2 Summons Issued as to Commissioner of Social Security Administration. U.S. Attorney and U.S. Attorney General. (cpeg, )
October 15, 2019 Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Commissioner of Social Security Administration Clerk's Note: See 28:636(b)(1)(C)(4)(c)(1) and Local Rule 83.VII.02 regarding Consents to Proceed before Magistrate Judge in Social Security cases. Consent to Proceed before Magistrate Judge forms are available on the Court's website., filed by Debra Jill Kyle Rahn. Service due by 1/13/2020(cpeg, )

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the South Carolina District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Kyle Rahn v. Commissioner of Social Security Administration
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Debra Jill Kyle Rahn
Represented By: Timothy Allen Clardy
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Commissioner of Social Security Administration
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Interested party: Social Security Administrative Record
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?