Hollis et al v. Del Webb Communities Inc
| Samuel B Hollis and Mary S Hollis |
| Del Webb Communities Inc |
| 9:2020cv00876 |
| February 28, 2020 |
| US District Court for the District of South Carolina |
| Bruce Howe Hendricks |
| Personal Property: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on April 20, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 12 CONSENT ORDER Compelling Arbitration: the Court grants Defendant's Motion to Compel Arbitration and dismisses this matter, without prejudice, pending the arbitration on the terms set within this Order. Brew Hagood appointed, Motions terminated: #11 Consent MOTION to Compel Arbitration filed by Del Webb Communities Inc. Signed by Honorable Bruce Howe Hendricks on 4/20/2020. (vdru, ) |
| Filing 11 Consent MOTION to Compel Arbitration by Del Webb Communities Inc. Response to Motion due by 5/1/2020. Add an additional 3 days only if served by mail or otherwise allowed under Fed. R. Civ. P. 6 or Fed. R. Crim. P. 45. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Purchase Agreement, #2 Exhibit Proposed Order)Proposed order is being emailed to chambers with copy to opposing counsel.(Dixon, Joshua) |
| Filing 10 TEXT ORDER granting #9 Motion for Extension of Time to Answer Del Webb Communities Inc. Answer deadline extended to 4/17/2020. Entered at the Direction of Honorable Bruce Howe Hendricks on 4/13/2020.(vdru, ) |
| Filing 9 Consent MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer by Del Webb Communities Inc. Response to Motion due by 4/24/2020. Add an additional 3 days only if served by mail or otherwise allowed under Fed. R. Civ. P. 6 or Fed. R. Crim. P. 45. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order Proposed Order for Extension of Time)Proposed order is being emailed to chambers with copy to opposing counsel.(Dixon, Joshua) |
| Filing 8 TEXT ORDER granting #7 Motion for Extension of Time to Answer Plaintiffs' Complaint. Del Webb Communities Inc answer due 4/10/2020. Entered at the Direction of Honorable Bruce Howe Hendricks on 4/6/2020.(vdru, ) |
| Filing 7 Consent MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer re #1 Notice of Removal, by Del Webb Communities Inc. Response to Motion due by 4/17/2020. Add an additional 3 days only if served by mail or otherwise allowed under Fed. R. Civ. P. 6 or Fed. R. Crim. P. 45. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)Proposed order is being emailed to chambers with copy to opposing counsel.(Dixon, Joshua) |
| Filing 6 TEXT ORDER granting #5 Motion for Extension of Time to Answer Del Webb Communities Inc answer due 4/3/2020. Entered at the Direction of The Honorable Bruce Howe Hendricks on 3/16/2020.(vdru, ) |
| Filing 5 Consent MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer to Complaint by Del Webb Communities Inc. Response to Motion due by 3/27/2020. Add an additional 3 days only if served by mail or otherwise allowed under Fed. R. Civ. P. 6 or Fed. R. Crim. P. 45. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)Proposed order is being emailed to chambers with copy to opposing counsel.(Dixon, Joshua) |
| Filing 2 Local Rule 26.01 Answers to Interrogatories by Del Webb Communities Inc.(vdru, ) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Beaufort County Court of Common Pleas, case number 2020-CP-27-00032. (Filing fee $ 400 receipt number 0420-8973306), filed by Del Webb Communities Inc. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A: State Court Documents, #2 Certificate of Service)(vdru, ) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the South Carolina District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
