Fulmer v. Kendell
| Robert M. Fulmer |
| Warden Brian Kendell |
| 9:2020cv00945 |
| March 4, 2020 |
| US District Court for the District of South Carolina |
| Sherri A Lydon |
| Bristow Marchant |
| Habeas Corpus (General) |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2241 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on September 23, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 12
OBJECTION to #8 Report and Recommendation by Robert M. Fulmer. Reply to Objections due by 5/14/2020 Add an additional 3 days only if served by mail or otherwise allowed under Fed. R. Civ. P. 6. (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(cpeg, )
|
|
Filing 11
ACKNOWLEDGMENT OF SERVICE Executed Acknowledgment filed by Brian Kendell. (Attachments: #1 Certificate of Service)(Brown, Melody)
|
|
Filing 9
***DOCUMENT MAILED 7 Order on Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis, #8 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION re #1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus filed by Robert M. Fulmer, #6 Order 2254, placed in U.S. Mail from Charleston Clerks Office to Robert M. Fulmer 317783 Lieber Correctional Institution 136 Wilborn Ave. Ridgeville, SC 29472 (cpeg, )
|
|
Filing 8
REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION of Magistrate Judge Bristow Marchant re #1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus filed by Robert M. Fulmer. It is recommended that the instant Petition for a Writ of Habeas Corpus be summarily dismissed without prejudice and without requiring Respondent to file a return. Objections to R&R due by 4/30/2020 Add an additional 3 days only if served by mail or otherwise allowed under Fed. R. Civ. P. 6 or Fed. R. Crim. P. 45. Signed by Magistrate Judge Bristow Marchant on 04/16/2020. (cpeg, )
|
|
Filing 7
REFERENCE #6 ORDER granting #2 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. Signed by Magistrate Judge Bristow Marchant on 04/16/2020.(cpeg, )
|
|
Filing 6
ORDER authorizing service of process. Directing petitioner to notify the clerk in writing of any change of address. Signed by Magistrate Judge Bristow Marchant on 04/16/2020. (Attachments: #1 Petition)(cpeg, ) Modified on 4/16/2020 to correct docket text (cpeg, ).
|
|
Filing 10
Letter from Robert Fulmer. (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(cpeg, )
|
|
Filing 2
MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis (Restricted Access) by Robert M. Fulmer. Response to Motion due by 3/18/2020. Add an additional 3 days only if served by mail or otherwise allowed under Fed. R. Civ. P. 6 or Fed. R. Crim. P. 45. (Attachments: #1 Envelope)Motions referred to Bristow Marchant. (egra, )
|
|
Filing 1
PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus, filed by Robert M. Fulmer. (Attachments: #1 Envelope) (egra, )
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the South Carolina District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Fulmer v. Kendell | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Petitioner: Robert M. Fulmer | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Respondent: Warden Brian Kendell | |
| Represented By: | Melody Jane Brown |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
