Thomas v. Scott et al
Plaintiff: Deangelo Laquawn Thomas
Defendant: James Floyd, Justin Morris and Kimberly Scott
Case Number: 9:2020cv02657
Filed: July 17, 2020
Court: US District Court for the District of South Carolina
Presiding Judge: Molly H Cherry
Referring Judge: David C Norton
Nature of Suit: Prisoner: Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on August 21, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
August 21, 2020 Filing 13 Letter from Deangelo Thomas. Note: A Docket sheet has been mailed to the plaintiff this date. (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(cpeg, )
August 17, 2020 Filing 11 Summons Issued as to James Floyd, Justin Morris, Kimberly Scott. Service due by 11/16/2020 (cpeg, )
August 17, 2020 Filing 10 ***DOCUMENT MAILED #8 Order 1983, 9 Order on Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis placed in U.S. Mail from Charleston Clerks Office to Deangelo Laquawn Thomas 1056288351119 Florence County Detention Center 6719 Friend Field Rd Effingham, SC 29541 (cpeg, )
August 17, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 9 REFERENCE #8 ORDER granting #2 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. Signed by Magistrate Judge Molly H Cherry on 08/17/2020.(cpeg, )
August 17, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 8 ORDER authorizing service of process and collection of filing fee. Plaintiff has incurred a debt to the U.S.A. in the amount of $350.00. Plaintiff is also directed to notify the clerk in writing of any change of address. Signed by Magistrate Judge Molly H Cherry on 08/17/2020. (cpeg, )
July 17, 2020 Filing 3 TRUE DIVISION FOR TRIAL: Florence. (cpeg, )
July 17, 2020 Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis (Restricted Access) by Deangelo Laquawn Thomas. Response to Motion due by 7/31/2020. Add an additional 3 days only if served by mail or otherwise allowed under Fed. R. Civ. P. 6 or Fed. R. Crim. P. 45. (Attachments: #1 Financial Certificate)No proposed order.Motions referred to Molly H Cherry.(cpeg, )
July 17, 2020 Filing 1 COMPLAINT against James Floyd, Justin Morris, Kimberly Scott, filed by Deangelo Laquawn Thomas. Service due by 10/15/2020 (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(cpeg, )

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the South Carolina District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Thomas v. Scott et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Deangelo Laquawn Thomas
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: James Floyd
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Justin Morris
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Kimberly Scott
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?