Al-Mujahidin v. Nelson et al
| Muhammad Al-Mujahidin |
| Elizabeth Ringold, K Plowden-Allen, Dr Stacy Smith, K Nelson, P Odom and S.C.D.C |
| 9:2021cv01041 |
| April 8, 2021 |
| US District Court for the District of South Carolina |
| Molly H Cherry |
| Bruce Howe Hendricks |
| Prison:Prison Condition |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on July 29, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 10
***DOCUMENT MAILED #9 Proper Form Order with required documents, placed in U.S. Mail from Charleston Clerks Office to Muhammad Al-Mujahidin 103968 Lee Correctional Institution 990 Wisacky Hwy Bishopville, SC 29010 (cpeg, )
|
|
Filing 9
PROPER FORM ORDER Case to be brought into proper form by 5/26/2021. Add an additional 3 days only if served by mail or otherwise allowed under Fed. R. Civ. P. 6. Signed by Magistrate Judge Molly H Cherry on 05/05/2021. (cpeg, )
|
|
Filing 3
TRUE DIVISION FOR TRIAL: Columbia. (cpeg, )
|
|
Filing 2
MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis (Restricted Access) by Muhammad Al-Mujahidin. (Attachments: #1 Envelope)No proposed order.Motions referred to Molly H Cherry.(cpeg, )
|
|
Filing 1
COMPLAINT against K Nelson, P Odom, K Plowden-Allen, Elizabeth Ringold, S.C.D.C, Stacy Smith, filed by Muhammad Al-Mujahidin. (Attachments: #1 Supporting Documents, #2 Envelope)(cpeg, )
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the South Carolina District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
