D'Ambrosio et al v. Government Employee Insurance Company
Joseph P D'Ambrosio and Mary A D'Ambrosio |
Government Employee Insurance Company |
9:2021cv02888 |
September 8, 2021 |
US District Court for the District of South Carolina |
Bruce Howe Hendricks |
Insurance |
28 U.S.C. ยง 2201 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on November 2, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 17 NOTICE of Appearance by Stephanie Paige Brown on behalf of Government Employee Insurance Company (Brown, Stephanie) |
Filing 16 RESPONSE in Opposition re #7 MOTION for Entry of Default Response filed by Government Employee Insurance Company.Reply to Response to Motion due by 11/9/2021 Add an additional 3 days only if served by mail or otherwise allowed under Fed. R. Civ. P. 6. (Templeton, Morgan) |
Filing 15 NOTICE of Cancellation of Hearing: IN PERSON Damages Hearing set for Thursday, 11/4/2021 at 03:00 PM. (vdru, ) |
Filing 14 TEXT ORDER granting #13 Motion to Continue the Damages Hearing. Entered at the Direction of The Honorable Bruce Howe Hendricks on 10/29/2021.(vdru, ) |
Filing 13 MOTION to Continue Hearing on Motion for Entry of Default Judgment and Damages by Government Employee Insurance Company. Response to Motion due by 11/12/2021. Add an additional 3 days only if served by mail or otherwise allowed under Fed. R. Civ. P. 6 or Fed. R. Crim. P. 45. No proposed order.(Templeton, Morgan) |
Filing 12 MOTION to Set Aside Default by Government Employee Insurance Company. Response to Motion due by 11/12/2021. Add an additional 3 days only if served by mail or otherwise allowed under Fed. R. Civ. P. 6 or Fed. R. Crim. P. 45. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A-Affidavit of Kimberly Gordon, #2 Exhibit B-Answer to Complaint, #3 LR 26.01 Answers)No proposed order.(Templeton, Morgan) |
Filing 11 NOTICE of Hearing: IN PERSON Damages Hearing set for Thursday, 11/4/2021 at 03:00 PM in Charleston Courtroom #2, J. Waties Waring Judicial Center, 83 Meeting St, Charleston before Honorable Bruce Howe Hendricks. (vdru, ) |
Filing 9 MOTION for Damages by Joseph P D'Ambrosio, Mary A D'Ambrosio. Response to Motion due by 11/5/2021. Add an additional 3 days only if served by mail or otherwise allowed under Fed. R. Civ. P. 6 or Fed. R. Crim. P. 45. No proposed order.(Johnson, Oana) |
Filing 8 Clerk's ENTRY OF DEFAULT as to Government Employee Insurance Company. (vdru, ) |
Filing 7 MOTION for Entry of Default by Joseph P D'Ambrosio, Mary A D'Ambrosio. Response to Motion due by 11/1/2021. Add an additional 3 days only if served by mail or otherwise allowed under Fed. R. Civ. P. 6 or Fed. R. Crim. P. 45. No proposed order.(Johnson, Oana) |
Filing 6 ACCEPTANCE OF SERVICE OF COMPLAINT by Mary A D'Ambrosio, Joseph P D'Ambrosio. Government Employee Insurance Company served on 9/13/2021, answer due 10/4/2021. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit SC DOI Acceptance of Service)(Johnson, Oana) |
Filing 3 Summons Issued as to Government Employee Insurance Company. (vdru, ) |
Filing 2 Local Rule 26.01 Answers to Interrogatories by Joseph P D'Ambrosio, Mary A D'Ambrosio.(vdru, ) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Government Employee Insurance Company ( Filing fee $ 402 receipt number 0420-10058781.), filed by Mary A D'Ambrosio, Joseph P D'Ambrosio. Service due by 12/7/2021. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1: Underlying Suit, #2 Exhibit 2: Denial Letter, #3 Exhibit 3: Amended Counterclaim, #4 Exhibit 4: Second Amended Complaint) (vdru, ) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the South Carolina District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.