Spencer v. Commissioner of Social Security Administration
Karren Spencer |
Commissioner of Social Security Administration |
Social Security Administrative Record and US Attorney - Social Security Noticing |
9:2021cv03390 |
October 15, 2021 |
US District Court for the District of South Carolina |
Molly H Cherry |
Richard M Gergel |
Social Security: DIWC/DIWW |
42 U.S.C. ยง 405 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on January 18, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 3 Notice: Social Security Case Service. Pursuant to Amended Standing Order 3:21-mc-00212-RBH signed by Chief Judge R. Bryan Harwell, the Clerk has issued a Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) using the Case Management and Electronic Case Filing (CM/ECF) system notifying the appropriate Regional Social Security Administration Office of the General Counsel and the United States Attorney's Office of the case. No summonses shall issue. Set Answer Deadline - Social Security Complaint: Answer due from Commissioner of Social Security Administration on 2/14/2022. (tsim, ) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Commissioner of Social Security Administration filed by Karren Spencer. ( Filing fee $ 402 receipt number 0420-10129493.) Clerk's Note: See 28:636(b)(1)(C)(4)(c)(1) and Local Rule 83.VII.02 regarding Consent to Proceed before Magistrate Judge in Social Security cases. Consent to Proceed before Magistrate Judge forms are available on the Court's website. (tsim, ) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the South Carolina District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.