Cook v. Gregory M Parker Inc et al
Keith Anthony Cook, Jr |
Gregory M Parker Inc, Parker's Corporation, Parker's 55 and Tajeeha Cohen |
9:2021cv03652 |
November 5, 2021 |
US District Court for the District of South Carolina |
Richard M Gergel |
Marine |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
Both |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on November 9, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
![]() |
Filing 6 Case Reassigned to Judge Honorable Richard M Gergel. Judge Honorable Sherri A Lydon no longer assigned to the case. (glev, ) |
Filing 5 MOTION to Strike language from the Plaintiff's Complaint pursuant Rule 12(f) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Re: #1 Notice of Removal, by Tajeeha Cohen, Gregory M Parker Inc, Parker's 55, Parker's Corporation. Response to Motion due by 11/19/2021. No proposed order. (lgib, ) |
Filing 4 ANSWER to Complaint (Notice of Removal) by Tajeeha Cohen, Gregory M Parker Inc, Parker's 55, Parker's Corporation. (lgib, ) |
Filing 3 Local Rule 26.01 Answers to Interrogatories by Tajeeha Cohen, Gregory M Parker Inc, Parker's 55, Parker's Corporation. (lgib, ) |
Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Hampton County Court of Common Pleas, case number 2021-CP-25-00352 (filing fee $402 receipt number ASCDC-10172661), filed by Parker's Corporation, Gregory M Parker Inc, Parker's 55, Tajeeha Cohen. (Attachments: #1 State Court Documents) (lgib, ) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the South Carolina District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.